From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: disk-io: Fix read_extent_data() error handler for missing device
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:35:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180330073528.20650-2-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180330073528.20650-1-wqu@suse.com>
When device is missing, read_extent_data() (function exported from old
btrfs check code) has the following problems:
1) Modify @len parameter if device is missing
If device returned in @multi is missing, @len can be larger than
@max_len (originl length).
This could confusing caller and underflow the read loop.
2) Still return 0 for missing device
It only handles read error, missing device is not handled and 0 is
returned.
3) Wrong check for device->fd
In fact, 0 is also a valid fd.
Although not possible under most case, it's still need fix.
Fix them all.
Fixes: 1bad2f2f2dfe ("Btrfs-progs: fsck: add an option to check data csums")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
disk-io.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index 610963357675..310ab19cf099 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -395,10 +395,12 @@ int read_extent_data(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, char *data, u64 logical,
}
device = multi->stripes[0].dev;
- if (device->fd <= 0)
- goto err;
if (*len > max_len)
*len = max_len;
+ if (device->fd < 0) {
+ ret = -EIO;
+ goto err;
+ }
ret = pread64(device->fd, data, *len, multi->stripes[0].physical);
if (ret != *len)
--
2.16.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-30 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-30 7:35 [PATCH 0/3] btrfs-progs: Enhance btrfs-image to handle missing device Qu Wenruo
2018-03-30 7:35 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2018-03-30 7:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: convert: Fix offset-by-one error in read_data_extent() Qu Wenruo
2018-03-30 7:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: tests/misc: Test if btrfs-image can handle RAID1 missing device Qu Wenruo
2018-03-30 20:14 ` David Sterba
2018-03-30 20:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] btrfs-progs: Enhance btrfs-image to handle " David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180330073528.20650-2-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).