From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: set keep_lock when necessary in btrfs_defrag_leaves
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:06:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180426180659.GX21272@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524706063-93210-1-git-send-email-bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:27:43AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> path->keep_lock may force to lock tree root and higher nodes, and make
> lock contention worse, thus it needs to be avoided as much as
> possible.
>
> In btrfs_degrag_leaves, path->keep_lock is set but @path immediatley
> gets released, which is not necessary at all.
So what is the effect of this? The locks are held throughout
btrfs_search_forward and released after that. Thi
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> v2: update commit log with more details.
>
> fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c
> index 3c0987ab587d..c12747904d4c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c
> @@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ int btrfs_defrag_leaves(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> memcpy(&key, &root->defrag_progress, sizeof(key));
> }
>
> - path->keep_locks = 1;
> -
> ret = btrfs_search_forward(root, &key, path, BTRFS_OLDEST_GENERATION);
What does btrfs_search_forward do as the first statement:
5115 int btrfs_search_forward(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_key *min_key,
5116 struct btrfs_path *path,
5117 u64 min_trans)
5118 {
.... declarations
5128
5129 path->keep_locks = 1;
So even if removed from above, there will be no change. The value of
keep_locks is preserved after btrfs_path_release.
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out;
> @@ -81,6 +79,7 @@ int btrfs_defrag_leaves(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> * a deadlock (attempting to write lock an already write locked leaf).
> */
> path->lowest_level = 1;
> + path->keep_locks = 1;
> wret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, 0, 1);
>
> if (wret < 0) {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 1:27 [PATCH v2] Btrfs: set keep_lock when necessary in btrfs_defrag_leaves Liu Bo
2018-04-26 4:57 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-04-26 18:06 ` David Sterba [this message]
2018-04-27 3:23 ` Liu Bo
2018-04-27 10:55 ` David Sterba
2018-04-27 5:36 ` Liu Bo
2018-05-01 13:39 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180426180659.GX21272@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox