From: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: [lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com: Re: About hung task on generic/041]
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:02:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180713090216.GC575@fnst.localdomain> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2682 bytes --]
Hi,
Sorry for the duplicate mail. The previous one seems to be due to the
attachment is too large to be sent to the mailing list.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 08:33:59PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:40:54AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
>>On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When I run generic/041 with v4.18-rc3 (turn on kasan and hung task
>>> detection), btrfs-transaction kthread will trigger the hung task timeout
>>> (stall at wait_event in btrfs_commit_transaction). At the same time, you
>>> can see that xfs_io -c fsync will occupy 100% of the CPU. I am not sure
>>> whether this is a problem. Any suggestion?
>>
>>Well, something at 100% cpu and that seems hang forever is definitely
>>a problem, specially a workload as simple as the one in generic/041
>
>To clarify, the hung task will end within 500s. Without KASAN, it will
>end within 80s, so it won't trigger hung task timeout 120s. I'm not sure
>if this is just slow, or have some problem?
Well, I tried to run generic/041 with v4.18-rc4(with KASAN) on the other
machine(with HDD) and it didn't finish all night. The hung task maybe
only end within 500s on SSD.
>
>>(never happened to me, even on vanilla 4.18-rc4).
See the attachment kernel_config. Maybe some config make you can't
replicate the case.
>>Do you have the stack trace for the fsync task? What you pasted below
>
>I will send the stack trace tomorrow.
See the attachment kasan.log.xz.
>From the log it seems that the time is consumed in the
btrfs_log_inode_parent loop call btrfs_log_inode.
I'm very willing to provide a trace(without KASAN) for comparison, but when
I run both systemtap and testcase, I have another problem.
See the attachment btrfs_sync_file.stp and 4.18-rc4.dmesg.
--
Thanks,
Lu
>
>--
>Thanks,
>Lu
>
>>is only for the transaction kthread and that alone doesn't help.
>>
>>>
>>> [Wed Jul 11 15:50:08 2018] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1053 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>>> [Wed Jul 11 15:50:08 2018] Not tainted 4.18.0-rc3-custom #14
>>> [Wed Jul 11 15:50:08 2018] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>>> [Wed Jul 11 15:50:08 2018] btrfs-transacti D 0 1053 2 0x80000000
>>> [Wed Jul 11 15:50:08 2018] Call Trace:
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Lu
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Filipe David Manana,
>>
>>“Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”
>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: kernel_config.xz --]
[-- Type: application/x-xz, Size: 27016 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: kasan.log.xz --]
[-- Type: application/x-xz, Size: 12284 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #4: btrfs_sync_file.stp --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 481 bytes --]
probe module("btrfs").statement("btrfs_sync_file@fs/btrfs/file.c:*") {
printf("%ld func %s pp %s\n", gettimeofday_us(), probefunc(), pp());
}
probe module("btrfs").function("btrfs_log_inode") {
printf("%ld func %s caller %s parms %s\n",
gettimeofday_us(), probefunc(), symname(caller_addr()), $$parms);
}
probe module("btrfs").statement("btrfs_log_inode_parent@fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:*") {
printf("%ld func %s pp %s\n",
gettimeofday_us(), probefunc(), pp());
}
[-- Attachment #5: 4.18-rc4.log.xz --]
[-- Type: application/x-xz, Size: 2188 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2018-07-13 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180713090216.GC575@fnst.localdomain \
--to=lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).