linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RESEND v7] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s)
@ 2018-07-26 11:32 Anand Jain
  2018-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH] btrfs: introduce feature to forget a btrfs device Anand Jain
  2018-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices Anand Jain
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2018-07-26 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs

[based on latest misc-next]

v7:
 Use struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args (instead of struct
  btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v2) as its inline with other ioctl
  btrfs-control
 The CLI usage remains same. However internally the ioctl flag is not
  required to delete all the unmounted devices. Instead leave
  btrfs_ioctl_vol_args::name NULL.

v6:
 Use the changed fn name btrfs_free_stale_devices().

 Change in title:
 Old v5:
 Cover-letter:
  [PATCH v5] Add cli and ioctl to ignore a scanned device
 Kernel:
  [PATCH v5] btrfs: introduce feature to ignore a btrfs device
 Progs:
  [PATCH v5] btrfs-progs: add 'btrfs device ignore' cli

v5:
  Adds feature to delete all stale devices
  Reuses btrfs_free_stale_devices() fn and so depends on the
    patch-set [1] in the ML.
  Uses struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v2 instead of
    struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args as arg
  Does the device path matching instead of btrfs_device matching
    (we won't delete the mounted device as btrfs_free_stale_devices()
    checks for it)
v4:
  No change. But as the ML thread may be confusing, so resend.
v3:
  No change. Send to correct ML.
v2:
  Accepts review from Nikolay, details are in the specific patch.
  Patch 1/2 is renamed from
    [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: refactor btrfs_free_stale_device() to get device list delete
  to
    [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: add function to device list delete

Adds cli and ioctl to forget a scanned device or forget all stale
devices in the kernel.

Anand Jain (1):
  btrfs: introduce feature to forget a btrfs device

 fs/btrfs/super.c           | 3 +++
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c         | 9 +++++++++
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h         | 1 +
 include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 2 ++
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

Anand Jain (1):
  btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices

 cmds-device.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 ioctl.h       |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)

-- 
2.7.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] btrfs: introduce feature to forget a btrfs device
  2018-07-26 11:32 [PATCH RESEND v7] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s) Anand Jain
@ 2018-07-26 11:32 ` Anand Jain
  2018-07-26 15:25   ` Filipe Manana
  2018-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices Anand Jain
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2018-07-26 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs

Support for a new command 'btrfs dev forget [dev]' is proposed here,
to undo the effects of 'btrfs dev scan [dev]'. For this purpose,
this patch proposes to use ioctl #5 as it was empty.
	IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 5, ..)
This patch adds new ioctl BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV which can be sent from
the /dev/btrfs-control to forget one or all devices, (devices which are
not mounted) from the btrfs kernel.

The argument it takes is struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args, and ::name can be
set to specify the device path. And all unmounted devices can be removed
from the kernel if no device path is provided.

Again, the devices are removed only if the relevant fsid aren't mounted.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/super.c           | 3 +++
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c         | 9 +++++++++
 fs/btrfs/volumes.h         | 1 +
 include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 2 ++
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 67de3c0fc85b..470a32af474e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -2244,6 +2244,9 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
 		ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(device);
 		mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
 		break;
+	case BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV:
+		ret = btrfs_forget_devices(vol->name);
+		break;
 	case BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY:
 		mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
 		device = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 8844904f9009..cd54a926141a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1208,6 +1208,15 @@ static int btrfs_read_disk_super(struct block_device *bdev, u64 bytenr,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int btrfs_forget_devices(const char *path)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
+	btrfs_free_stale_devices(strlen(path) ? path:NULL, NULL);
+	mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Look for a btrfs signature on a device. This may be called out of the mount path
  * and we are not allowed to call set_blocksize during the scan. The superblock
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
index 049619176831..1602b5faa7e7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
@@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ int btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
 		       fmode_t flags, void *holder);
 struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path,
 					   fmode_t flags, void *holder);
+int btrfs_forget_devices(const char *path);
 int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
 void btrfs_free_extra_devids(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, int step);
 void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_device *device,
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
index 5ca1d21fc4a7..b1be7f828cb4 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
@@ -836,6 +836,8 @@ enum btrfs_err_code {
 				   struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
 #define BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 4, \
 				   struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
+#define BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 5, \
+				   struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
 /* trans start and trans end are dangerous, and only for
  * use by applications that know how to avoid the
  * resulting deadlocks
-- 
2.7.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices
  2018-07-26 11:32 [PATCH RESEND v7] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s) Anand Jain
  2018-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH] btrfs: introduce feature to forget a btrfs device Anand Jain
@ 2018-07-26 11:32 ` Anand Jain
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2018-07-26 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs

This patch adds cli
  btrfs device forget [dev]
to remove the given device structure in the kernel if the device
is unmounted. If no argument is given it shall remove all stale
(device which are not mounted) from the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
 cmds-device.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 ioctl.h       |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)

diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
index 86459d1b9564..49cfd4b41adb 100644
--- a/cmds-device.c
+++ b/cmds-device.c
@@ -326,6 +326,63 @@ out:
 	return !!ret;
 }
 
+static const char * const cmd_device_forget_usage[] = {
+	"btrfs device forget [<device>]",
+	"Forget a stale device or all stale devices in btrfs.ko",
+	NULL
+};
+
+static int btrfs_forget_devices(char *path)
+{
+	struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args args;
+	int ret;
+	int fd;
+
+	fd = open("/dev/btrfs-control", O_RDWR);
+	if (fd < 0)
+		return -errno;
+
+	memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
+	if (path)
+		strncpy_null(args.name, path);
+	ret = ioctl(fd, BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV, &args);
+	if (ret)
+		ret = -errno;
+	close(fd);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int cmd_device_forget(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+	char *path;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (check_argc_max(argc - optind, 1))
+		usage(cmd_device_forget_usage);
+
+	if (argc == 1) {
+		ret = btrfs_forget_devices(NULL);
+		if (ret)
+			error("Can't forget: %s", strerror(-ret));
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	path = canonicalize_path(argv[1]);
+	if (!path) {
+		error("Could not canonicalize path '%s': %s",
+					argv[1], strerror(errno));
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
+
+	ret  = btrfs_forget_devices(path);
+	if (ret)
+		error("Can't forget '%s': %s", path, strerror(-ret));
+
+	free(path);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static const char * const cmd_device_ready_usage[] = {
 	"btrfs device ready <device>",
 	"Check device to see if it has all of its devices in cache for mounting",
@@ -601,6 +658,7 @@ const struct cmd_group device_cmd_group = {
 			CMD_ALIAS },
 		{ "remove", cmd_device_remove, cmd_device_remove_usage, NULL, 0 },
 		{ "scan", cmd_device_scan, cmd_device_scan_usage, NULL, 0 },
+		{ "forget", cmd_device_forget, cmd_device_forget_usage, NULL, 0 },
 		{ "ready", cmd_device_ready, cmd_device_ready_usage, NULL, 0 },
 		{ "stats", cmd_device_stats, cmd_device_stats_usage, NULL, 0 },
 		{ "usage", cmd_device_usage,
diff --git a/ioctl.h b/ioctl.h
index 709e996f401c..e27d80e09392 100644
--- a/ioctl.h
+++ b/ioctl.h
@@ -721,6 +721,8 @@ static inline char *btrfs_err_str(enum btrfs_err_code err_code)
 				   struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
 #define BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 4, \
 				   struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
+#define BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 5, \
+				   struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
 /* trans start and trans end are dangerous, and only for
  * use by applications that know how to avoid the
  * resulting deadlocks
-- 
2.7.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: introduce feature to forget a btrfs device
  2018-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH] btrfs: introduce feature to forget a btrfs device Anand Jain
@ 2018-07-26 15:25   ` Filipe Manana
  2018-07-26 23:51     ` Anand Jain
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Filipe Manana @ 2018-07-26 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> wrote:
> Support for a new command 'btrfs dev forget [dev]' is proposed here,
> to undo the effects of 'btrfs dev scan [dev]'. For this purpose,
> this patch proposes to use ioctl #5 as it was empty.
>         IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 5, ..)
> This patch adds new ioctl BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV which can be sent from
> the /dev/btrfs-control to forget one or all devices, (devices which are
> not mounted) from the btrfs kernel.
>
> The argument it takes is struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args, and ::name can be
> set to specify the device path. And all unmounted devices can be removed
> from the kernel if no device path is provided.
>
> Again, the devices are removed only if the relevant fsid aren't mounted.

And why is the feature needed? What problems does it solve?
That is missing from the changelog, no matter how obvious it is to you
(or anyone else), it should be mentioned in the changelog.

Thanks.

>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/super.c           | 3 +++
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c         | 9 +++++++++
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.h         | 1 +
>  include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 2 ++
>  4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index 67de3c0fc85b..470a32af474e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -2244,6 +2244,9 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>                 ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(device);
>                 mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
>                 break;
> +       case BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV:
> +               ret = btrfs_forget_devices(vol->name);
> +               break;
>         case BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY:
>                 mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
>                 device = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 8844904f9009..cd54a926141a 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -1208,6 +1208,15 @@ static int btrfs_read_disk_super(struct block_device *bdev, u64 bytenr,
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +int btrfs_forget_devices(const char *path)
> +{
> +       mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
> +       btrfs_free_stale_devices(strlen(path) ? path:NULL, NULL);
> +       mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Look for a btrfs signature on a device. This may be called out of the mount path
>   * and we are not allowed to call set_blocksize during the scan. The superblock
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> index 049619176831..1602b5faa7e7 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> @@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ int btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
>                        fmode_t flags, void *holder);
>  struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path,
>                                            fmode_t flags, void *holder);
> +int btrfs_forget_devices(const char *path);
>  int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
>  void btrfs_free_extra_devids(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, int step);
>  void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_device *device,
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
> index 5ca1d21fc4a7..b1be7f828cb4 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
> @@ -836,6 +836,8 @@ enum btrfs_err_code {
>                                    struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
>  #define BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 4, \
>                                    struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
> +#define BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 5, \
> +                                  struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
>  /* trans start and trans end are dangerous, and only for
>   * use by applications that know how to avoid the
>   * resulting deadlocks
> --
> 2.7.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Filipe David Manana,

“Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: introduce feature to forget a btrfs device
  2018-07-26 15:25   ` Filipe Manana
@ 2018-07-26 23:51     ` Anand Jain
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2018-07-26 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fdmanana; +Cc: linux-btrfs



On 07/26/2018 11:25 PM, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Support for a new command 'btrfs dev forget [dev]' is proposed here,
>> to undo the effects of 'btrfs dev scan [dev]'. For this purpose,
>> this patch proposes to use ioctl #5 as it was empty.
>>          IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 5, ..)
>> This patch adds new ioctl BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV which can be sent from
>> the /dev/btrfs-control to forget one or all devices, (devices which are
>> not mounted) from the btrfs kernel.
>>
>> The argument it takes is struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args, and ::name can be
>> set to specify the device path. And all unmounted devices can be removed
>> from the kernel if no device path is provided.
>>
>> Again, the devices are removed only if the relevant fsid aren't mounted.
> 
> And why is the feature needed? What problems does it solve?
> That is missing from the changelog, no matter how obvious it is to you
> (or anyone else), it should be mentioned in the changelog.

  There are few reasons..
  . Release of unwanted btrfs_fs_devices and btrfs_devices memory if the
    device is not going to be mounted.
  . Ability to mount the device in degraded mode when one of the other
    device is corrupted (patch [1] in the ML explained this).
      [1] btrfs: handle volume split brain scenario
  . Running test cases which requires btrfs.ko-reload if the rootfs
    is btrfs.

Thanks, Anand


> Thanks.
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/btrfs/super.c           | 3 +++
>>   fs/btrfs/volumes.c         | 9 +++++++++
>>   fs/btrfs/volumes.h         | 1 +
>>   include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 2 ++
>>   4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
>> index 67de3c0fc85b..470a32af474e 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
>> @@ -2244,6 +2244,9 @@ static long btrfs_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>>                  ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(device);
>>                  mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
>>                  break;
>> +       case BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV:
>> +               ret = btrfs_forget_devices(vol->name);
>> +               break;
>>          case BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY:
>>                  mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
>>                  device = btrfs_scan_one_device(vol->name, FMODE_READ,
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> index 8844904f9009..cd54a926141a 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> @@ -1208,6 +1208,15 @@ static int btrfs_read_disk_super(struct block_device *bdev, u64 bytenr,
>>          return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +int btrfs_forget_devices(const char *path)
>> +{
>> +       mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
>> +       btrfs_free_stale_devices(strlen(path) ? path:NULL, NULL);
>> +       mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex);
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * Look for a btrfs signature on a device. This may be called out of the mount path
>>    * and we are not allowed to call set_blocksize during the scan. The superblock
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> index 049619176831..1602b5faa7e7 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> @@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ int btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
>>                         fmode_t flags, void *holder);
>>   struct btrfs_device *btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path,
>>                                             fmode_t flags, void *holder);
>> +int btrfs_forget_devices(const char *path);
>>   int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
>>   void btrfs_free_extra_devids(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, int step);
>>   void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_device *device,
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
>> index 5ca1d21fc4a7..b1be7f828cb4 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
>> @@ -836,6 +836,8 @@ enum btrfs_err_code {
>>                                     struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
>>   #define BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 4, \
>>                                     struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
>> +#define BTRFS_IOC_FORGET_DEV _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 5, \
>> +                                  struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
>>   /* trans start and trans end are dangerous, and only for
>>    * use by applications that know how to avoid the
>>    * resulting deadlocks
>> --
>> 2.7.0
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-07-27  1:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-07-26 11:32 [PATCH RESEND v7] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s) Anand Jain
2018-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH] btrfs: introduce feature to forget a btrfs device Anand Jain
2018-07-26 15:25   ` Filipe Manana
2018-07-26 23:51     ` Anand Jain
2018-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices Anand Jain

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).