From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:37156 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726163AbeITX0C (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:26:02 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 2-v6so4772523pgo.4 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:41:24 -0700 From: Omar Sandoval To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, David Sterba Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] Btrfs: implement swap file support Message-ID: <20180920174124.GB26479@vader> References: <20180920172255.GE5847@twin.jikos.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20180920172255.GE5847@twin.jikos.cz> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 07:22:55PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:02:11PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > From: Omar Sandoval > > Changes from v7 [1]: > > > > - Expanded a few commit messages > > - Added Johannes' acked-by on patches 1 and 2 > > - Rebased on v4.19-rc4 > > I've sent my comments, it's mostly about the usability or small > enhancements. As you've got acks from MM people, I hope it would be ok > if I add this series to for-next so we can give it some testing. That'd be great. Feel free to grab it from my git tree (https://github.com/osandov/linux/tree/btrfs-swap) if you want the version with your comments addressed. > The MM patches would better go separately to 4.20 via the mm tree. I > did only build tests so 4.20 target is still feasible but given that > it's rc4 it's a bit too close. There are some limitations posed by the > swapfiles so I'd like to have a chance to do some actual tests myself > and check the usability status. 4.20 would be nice, but I could live with 4.21. I'll just be backporting it to our internal kernel here anyways ;) Let me know how the tests go and which way you want to go. Thanks! It's nice to finally have the end in sight for this series, it's almost 4 years old, although it's changed quite a bit since https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/17/141.