linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Subject: Next btrfs development cycle open - 4.21
Date: Tue,  9 Oct 2018 18:40:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181009164040.17819-1-dsterba@suse.com> (raw)

From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>

Hi,

a friendly reminder of the timetable and what's expected at this phase.

4.18 - current
4.19 - upcoming, urgent regression fixes only
4.20 - development closed, pull request in prep, fixes or regressions only
4.21 - development open, until 4.20-rc5 (at least)

(https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Developer%27s_FAQ#Development_schedule)

Whether the next version is going to be 4.20 or 5.0 I don't know, I'll use the
4.x for references. There will be 4.19-rc8 milestone, probably the last one
before the final release.


Current status
--------------

The branch misc-4.20 contains patches that will be sent in the first 4.20
batch.  There are about 90, fewer than in previous cycles.

There might be 2nd pull sent during the merge window, the reviews are going
slow but there are still patches/fixes that I'd like to get merged.


Hilights of 4.20 changes
------------------------

The more detailed description will be in the pull request, brief summary:

* (performance) relocation with qgroups on -- skip unnecessary qgroup
  accounting work during merging b-trees after relocation, claimed improvement
  is 20-40%+ (run time) but highly depends on the extent layout

* (performance) b-tree path traversal and locking improvements -- no more
  switching between blocking and spinning mode, sample measurements show
  noticeable improvements in latency and run time

* (performance) rb-tree caching -- repeated tree traversal does not need to
  spend time chasing pointers up to the first node


Git development repos
---------------------

  k.org: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git
  devel1: https://gitlab.com/kdave/btrfs-devel
  devel2: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel

Note: git repository at repo.or.cz is discouraged from use

The devel repos should be identical regarding the main development branches
like misc-next or for-next-YYYYMMDD.


Usual points
------------

* the current patch queue (as is in misc-next) looks stable, so no big
  changes are going to be applied at this time. The usual exceptions are
  bugfixes or obvious cleanups.

* the base of the patches should be the last announced pull request,
  which is going to be named 'for-4.20' in my k.org tree.  Reviewed
  patches will be collected in a branch that's usually named 'misc-next'
  in my devel git repos and is part of the for-next at k.org git repo.

* merging of new patches to misc-next will be slow during the
  merge window, also because there's a btrfs-progs release scheduled

* everybody is encouraged to review and test other's patches

             reply	other threads:[~2018-10-09 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-09 16:40 David Sterba [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-17 14:24 Next btrfs development cycle open - 4.21 David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181009164040.17819-1-dsterba@suse.com \
    --to=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).