From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Linux BTRFS Mailinglist <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] Misc cosmetic changes for map_private_extent_buffer
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 09:54:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181128085456.5702-1-jthumshirn@suse.de> (raw)
While trying to understand the checksum code I came across some oddities
regarding map_private_extent_buffer() and it's interaction with
csum_tree_block().
These patches address them but are either purely cosmetic or only add a
comment documenting behaviour.
Changes to v1:
* Add Reviewed-by tags
* Change wording of commit message in patch 3/3
Johannes Thumshirn (3):
btrfs: don't initialize 'offset' in map_private_extent_buffer()
btrfs: use offset_in_page for start_offset in
map_private_extent_buffer()
btrfs: document extent mapping assumptions in checksum
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 6 ++++++
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.16.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-11-28 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-28 8:54 Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2018-11-28 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] btrfs: don't initialize 'offset' in map_private_extent_buffer() Johannes Thumshirn
2018-11-28 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] btrfs: use offset_in_page for start_offset " Johannes Thumshirn
2018-11-28 15:41 ` David Sterba
2018-12-03 10:59 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-11-28 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] btrfs: document extent mapping assumptions in checksum Johannes Thumshirn
2018-11-28 8:58 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-11-28 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Misc cosmetic changes for map_private_extent_buffer David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181128085456.5702-1-jthumshirn@suse.de \
--to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).