public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.de>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>,
	Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] btrfs: qgroup: Delay subtree scan to reduce overhead
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 17:17:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181208161736.GI23615@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cea2079-cef5-6833-884d-a3c8edc4c14a@suse.de>

On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 08:50:32AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > I've adapted a stress tests that unpacks a large tarball, snaphosts
> > every 20 seconds, deletes a random snapshot every 50 seconds, deletes
> > file from the original subvolume, now enhanced with qgroups just for the
> > new snapshots inherigin the toplevel subvolume. Lockup.
> > 
> > It gets stuck in a snapshot call with the follwin stacktrace
> > 
> > [<0>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0xf3/0x150 [btrfs]
> > [<0>] btrfs_qgroup_trace_subtree+0x280/0x7b0 [btrfs]
> 
> This looks like the original subtree tracing has something wrong.

Yes, I ran the test on current master and it locked up too, so it's not
due to your patchset.

> Thanks for the report, I'll investigate it.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-08 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-08  5:49 [PATCH v2 0/6] btrfs: qgroup: Delay subtree scan to reduce overhead Qu Wenruo
2018-11-08  5:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] btrfs: qgroup: Allow btrfs_qgroup_extent_record::old_roots unpopulated at insert time Qu Wenruo
2018-11-08  5:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots() Qu Wenruo
2018-11-08  5:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] btrfs: qgroup: Refactor btrfs_qgroup_trace_subtree_swap() Qu Wenruo
2018-11-08  5:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] btrfs: qgroup: Introduce per-root swapped blocks infrastructure Qu Wenruo
2018-11-08  5:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] btrfs: qgroup: Use delayed subtree rescan for balance Qu Wenruo
2018-11-08  5:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] btrfs: qgroup: Cleanup old subtree swap code Qu Wenruo
2018-11-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] btrfs: qgroup: Delay subtree scan to reduce overhead David Sterba
2018-11-13 17:07   ` David Sterba
2018-11-13 17:58     ` Filipe Manana
2018-11-13 23:56       ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-14 19:05       ` David Sterba
2018-11-15  5:23         ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-15 10:28           ` David Sterba
2018-12-06 19:35   ` David Sterba
2018-12-06 22:51     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-12-08  0:47       ` David Sterba
2018-12-08  0:50         ` Qu Wenruo
2018-12-08 16:17           ` David Sterba [this message]
2018-12-10 10:45           ` Filipe Manana
2018-12-10 11:23             ` Qu Wenruo
2018-12-10  5:51         ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181208161736.GI23615@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox