From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jeffm@suse.com, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/15] btrfs: Handle pending/pinned chunks before blockgroup relocation during device shrink
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:50:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190130145102.4708-6-nborisov@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190130145102.4708-1-nborisov@suse.com>
During device shrink pinned/pending chunks (i.e those which have been
deleted/created respectively, in the current transaction and haven't
touched disk) need to be accounted when doing device shrink. Presently
this happens after the main relocation loop in btrfs_shrink_device,
which could lead to making another go in the body of the function.
Since there is no hard requirement to perform pinned/pending chunks
handling after the relocation loop, move the code before it. This leads
to simplifying the code flow around - i.e no need to use 'goto again'.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 4f645e1b5539..be91432697ab 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -4712,15 +4712,15 @@ int btrfs_shrink_device(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 new_size)
int slot;
int failed = 0;
bool retried = false;
- bool checked_pending_chunks = false;
struct extent_buffer *l;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_super_block *super_copy = fs_info->super_copy;
u64 old_total = btrfs_super_total_bytes(super_copy);
u64 old_size = btrfs_device_get_total_bytes(device);
u64 diff;
+ u64 start;
- new_size = round_down(new_size, fs_info->sectorsize);
+ start = new_size = round_down(new_size, fs_info->sectorsize);
diff = round_down(old_size - new_size, fs_info->sectorsize);
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT, &device->dev_state))
@@ -4732,6 +4732,10 @@ int btrfs_shrink_device(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 new_size)
path->reada = READA_BACK;
+ trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(trans))
+ return PTR_ERR(trans);
+
mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
btrfs_device_set_total_bytes(device, new_size);
@@ -4739,7 +4743,21 @@ int btrfs_shrink_device(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 new_size)
device->fs_devices->total_rw_bytes -= diff;
atomic64_sub(diff, &fs_info->free_chunk_space);
}
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+
+ /*
+ * Once the device's size has been set to the new size, ensure all
+ * in-memory chunks are synced to disk so that the loop below sees them
+ * and relocates them accordingly.
+ */
+ if (contains_pending_extent(trans->transaction, device, &start, diff)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+ ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
+ if (ret)
+ goto done;
+ } else {
+ mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+ btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
+ }
again:
key.objectid = device->devid;
@@ -4830,36 +4848,6 @@ int btrfs_shrink_device(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 new_size)
}
mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
-
- /*
- * We checked in the above loop all device extents that were already in
- * the device tree. However before we have updated the device's
- * total_bytes to the new size, we might have had chunk allocations that
- * have not complete yet (new block groups attached to transaction
- * handles), and therefore their device extents were not yet in the
- * device tree and we missed them in the loop above. So if we have any
- * pending chunk using a device extent that overlaps the device range
- * that we can not use anymore, commit the current transaction and
- * repeat the search on the device tree - this way we guarantee we will
- * not have chunks using device extents that end beyond 'new_size'.
- */
- if (!checked_pending_chunks) {
- u64 start = new_size;
- u64 len = old_size - new_size;
-
- if (contains_pending_extent(trans->transaction, device,
- &start, len)) {
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
- checked_pending_chunks = true;
- failed = 0;
- retried = false;
- ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
- if (ret)
- goto done;
- goto again;
- }
- }
-
btrfs_device_set_disk_total_bytes(device, new_size);
if (list_empty(&device->post_commit_list))
list_add_tail(&device->post_commit_list,
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-30 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-30 14:50 [PATCH 00/15] Improvements to fitrim Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 01/15] btrfs: Honour FITRIM range constraints during free space trim Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:21 ` David Sterba
2019-01-31 15:35 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:48 ` David Sterba
2019-01-31 19:30 ` Jeff Mahoney
2019-01-31 21:45 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 02/15] btrfs: Make WARN_ON in a canonical form Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:22 ` David Sterba
2019-02-04 13:12 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/15] btrfs: Remove EXTENT_FIRST_DELALLOC bit Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:23 ` David Sterba
2019-02-04 13:15 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 04/15] btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-04 13:25 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-02-04 14:48 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-05 9:21 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-02-04 13:29 ` [PATCH 05/15] btrfs: Handle pending/pinned chunks before blockgroup relocation during device shrink Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 06/15] btrfs: Rename and export clear_btree_io_tree Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-04 13:31 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 07/15] btrfs: Populate ->orig_block_len during read_one_chunk Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 08/15] btrfs: Introduce new bits for device allocation tree Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 09/15] btrfs: replace pending/pinned chunks lists with io tree Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 10/15] btrfs: Remove 'trans' argument from find_free_dev_extent(_start) Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-04 14:36 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 11/15] btrfs: Factor out in_range macro Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-04 13:57 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-01-30 14:50 ` [PATCH 12/15] btrfs: Optimize unallocated chunks discard Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:51 ` [PATCH 13/15] btrfs: Fix gross misnaming Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:51 ` [PATCH 14/15] btrfs: Implement find_first_clear_extent_bit Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-04 14:04 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-02-04 16:57 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-30 14:51 ` [PATCH 15/15] btrfs: Switch btrfs_trim_free_extents to find_first_clear_extent_bit Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-31 15:41 ` [PATCH v3] " Nikolay Borisov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190130145102.4708-6-nborisov@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox