From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Linux BTRFS Mailinglist <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3] btrfs: factor our read/write stage off csum_tree_block() into its callers
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:43:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190219124353.22948-1-jthumshirn@suse.de> (raw)
Currently csum_tree_block() does two things, first it as it's name
suggests it calculates the checksum for a tree-block. But it also writes
this checksum to disk or reads an extent_buffer from disk and compares the
checksum with the calculated checksum, depending on the verify argument.
Furthermore one of the two callers passes in '1' for the verify argument,
the other one passes in '0'.
For clarity and less layering violations, factor out the second stage in
csum_tree_block()'s callers.
Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
---
Changes to v2:
- Directly return -EINVAL instead of EUCLEAN
Changes to v1:
- return error from csum_tree_buffer() in csum_dirty_buffer() instead of
EUCLEAN (Nikolay)
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 5216e7b3f9ad..77089283be51 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -263,12 +263,9 @@ void btrfs_csum_final(u32 crc, u8 *result)
* compute the csum for a btree block, and either verify it or write it
* into the csum field of the block.
*/
-static int csum_tree_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
- struct extent_buffer *buf,
- int verify)
+static int csum_tree_block(struct extent_buffer *buf,
+ u8 *result)
{
- u16 csum_size = btrfs_super_csum_size(fs_info->super_copy);
- char result[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE];
unsigned long len;
unsigned long cur_len;
unsigned long offset = BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE;
@@ -300,23 +297,6 @@ static int csum_tree_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
btrfs_csum_final(crc, result);
- if (verify) {
- if (memcmp_extent_buffer(buf, result, 0, csum_size)) {
- u32 val;
- u32 found = 0;
- memcpy(&found, result, csum_size);
-
- read_extent_buffer(buf, &val, 0, csum_size);
- btrfs_warn_rl(fs_info,
- "%s checksum verify failed on %llu wanted %X found %X level %d",
- fs_info->sb->s_id, buf->start,
- val, found, btrfs_header_level(buf));
- return -EUCLEAN;
- }
- } else {
- write_extent_buffer(buf, result, 0, csum_size);
- }
-
return 0;
}
@@ -533,6 +513,8 @@ static int csum_dirty_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct page *page)
{
u64 start = page_offset(page);
u64 found_start;
+ u8 result[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE];
+ u16 csum_size = btrfs_super_csum_size(fs_info->super_copy);
struct extent_buffer *eb;
eb = (struct extent_buffer *)page->private;
@@ -552,7 +534,11 @@ static int csum_dirty_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct page *page)
ASSERT(memcmp_extent_buffer(eb, fs_info->fs_devices->metadata_uuid,
btrfs_header_fsid(), BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0);
- return csum_tree_block(fs_info, eb, 0);
+ if (WARN_ON(csum_tree_block(eb, result)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ write_extent_buffer(eb, result, 0, csum_size);
+ return 0;
}
static int check_tree_block_fsid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
@@ -595,7 +581,9 @@ static int btree_readpage_end_io_hook(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
struct extent_buffer *eb;
struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(page->mapping->host)->root;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
+ u16 csum_size = btrfs_super_csum_size(fs_info->super_copy);
int ret = 0;
+ char result[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE];
int reads_done;
if (!page->private)
@@ -642,10 +630,25 @@ static int btree_readpage_end_io_hook(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
btrfs_set_buffer_lockdep_class(btrfs_header_owner(eb),
eb, found_level);
- ret = csum_tree_block(fs_info, eb, 1);
+ ret = csum_tree_block(eb, result);
if (ret)
goto err;
+ if (memcmp_extent_buffer(eb, result, 0, csum_size)) {
+ u32 val;
+ u32 found = 0;
+
+ memcpy(&found, result, csum_size);
+
+ read_extent_buffer(eb, &val, 0, csum_size);
+ btrfs_warn_rl(fs_info,
+ "%s checksum verify failed on %llu wanted %x found %x level %d",
+ fs_info->sb->s_id, eb->start,
+ val, found, btrfs_header_level(eb));
+ ret = -EUCLEAN;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
/*
* If this is a leaf block and it is corrupt, set the corrupt bit so
* that we don't try and read the other copies of this block, just
--
2.16.4
next reply other threads:[~2019-02-19 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-19 12:43 Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2019-02-22 14:55 ` [PATCH v3] btrfs: factor our read/write stage off csum_tree_block() into its callers David Sterba
2019-02-25 11:17 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-02-25 12:05 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190219124353.22948-1-jthumshirn@suse.de \
--to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).