From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dan.carpenter@oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: extent_io: Unify the return value of alloc_test_extent_buffer() with alloc_extent_buffer()
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:16:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190222101645.4403-5-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222101645.4403-1-wqu@suse.com>
The function only get called in two locations:
1) free-space-tree-tests.c
2) qgroup-tests.c
These call sites are stubs.
3) btrfs_find_create_tree_block()
Since all existing btrfs_find_create_tree_block() callers handles
the return value correctly, it's also a stub.
So all alloc_test_extent_buffer() callers should be covered by this
patch.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c | 3 ++-
fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index f9c9da9b84a3..a19bd8bc3b32 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -4863,6 +4863,7 @@ struct extent_buffer *find_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS
+/* Will either return valid pointer or PTR_ERR(), NEVER NULL pointer. */
struct extent_buffer *alloc_test_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
u64 start)
{
@@ -4874,12 +4875,14 @@ struct extent_buffer *alloc_test_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
return eb;
eb = alloc_dummy_extent_buffer(fs_info, start);
if (IS_ERR(eb))
- return NULL;
+ return eb;
eb->fs_info = fs_info;
again:
ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS);
- if (ret)
- goto free_eb;
+ if (ret) {
+ btrfs_release_extent_buffer(eb);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ }
spin_lock(&fs_info->buffer_lock);
ret = radix_tree_insert(&fs_info->buffer_radix,
start >> PAGE_SHIFT, eb);
@@ -4887,18 +4890,16 @@ struct extent_buffer *alloc_test_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
radix_tree_preload_end();
if (ret == -EEXIST) {
exists = find_extent_buffer(fs_info, start);
- if (exists)
- goto free_eb;
- else
- goto again;
+ if (exists) {
+ btrfs_release_extent_buffer(eb);
+ return exists;
+ }
+ goto again;
}
check_buffer_tree_ref(eb);
set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_IN_TREE, &eb->bflags);
return eb;
-free_eb:
- btrfs_release_extent_buffer(eb);
- return exists;
}
#endif
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c
index 89346da890cf..025fce63959a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c
@@ -462,7 +462,8 @@ static int run_test(test_func_t test_func, int bitmaps, u32 sectorsize,
root->fs_info->tree_root = root;
root->node = alloc_test_extent_buffer(root->fs_info, nodesize);
- if (!root->node) {
+ if (IS_ERR(root->node)) {
+ root->node = NULL;
test_err("couldn't allocate dummy buffer");
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c
index 412b910b04cc..536600eb4d9d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c
@@ -484,7 +484,8 @@ int btrfs_test_qgroups(u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
* *cough*backref walking code*cough*
*/
root->node = alloc_test_extent_buffer(root->fs_info, nodesize);
- if (!root->node) {
+ if (IS_ERR(root->node)) {
+ root->node = NULL;
test_err("couldn't allocate dummy buffer");
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-22 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-22 10:16 [PATCH 0/5] Unify the return value of alloc/clone_extent_buffer() Qu Wenruo
2019-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: extent_io: Add comment about the return value of alloc_extent_buffer() Qu Wenruo
2019-02-27 13:36 ` David Sterba
2019-02-27 13:41 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-02-27 13:44 ` David Sterba
2019-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs: extent_io: Unify the return value of __alloc_extent_buffer() with alloc_extent_buffer() Qu Wenruo
2019-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: extent_io: Unify the return value of alloc_dummy_extent_buffer() " Qu Wenruo
2019-02-22 10:16 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: extent_io: Unify the return value of btrfs_clone_extent_buffer() " Qu Wenruo
2019-02-22 12:47 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-22 12:53 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-02-22 13:02 ` [PATCH v1.1 " Qu Wenruo
2019-02-22 12:54 ` [PATCH 0/5] Unify the return value of alloc/clone_extent_buffer() Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-22 13:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-02-22 13:29 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-02-22 13:31 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-02-27 14:11 ` David Sterba
2019-02-22 13:32 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190222101645.4403-5-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).