linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: Exploit the fact pages passed to extent_readpages are always contiguous
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:55:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190311075538.19242-1-nborisov@suse.com> (raw)

Currently extent_readpages (called from btrfs_redpages) will always call
__extent_readpages which tries to create contiguous range of pages and
call __do_contiguous_readpages when such contiguous range is created.

It turns out this is unnecessary due to the fact that generic VFS code
always calls filesystem's ->readpages callback (btrfs_readpages in
this case) with already contiguous pages. Armed with this knowledge it's
possible to simplify extent_readpages by eliminating the call to
__extent_readpages and directly calling contiguous_readpages. The only
edge case that needs to be handled is when add_to_page_cache_lru
fails. This is easy as all that is needed is to submit whatever is the
number of pages successfully added to the lru.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---

I've been running with this patch for the past 3 months and haven't encountered 
any issues with it.
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 58 +++++++++++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index b20700ad8752..551dd21d7351 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3066,7 +3066,7 @@ static int __do_readpage(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static inline void __do_contiguous_readpages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
+static inline void contiguous_readpages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 					     struct page *pages[], int nr_pages,
 					     u64 start, u64 end,
 					     struct extent_map **em_cached,
@@ -3097,46 +3097,6 @@ static inline void __do_contiguous_readpages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 	}
 }
 
-static void __extent_readpages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
-			       struct page *pages[],
-			       int nr_pages,
-			       struct extent_map **em_cached,
-			       struct bio **bio, unsigned long *bio_flags,
-			       u64 *prev_em_start)
-{
-	u64 start = 0;
-	u64 end = 0;
-	u64 page_start;
-	int index;
-	int first_index = 0;
-
-	for (index = 0; index < nr_pages; index++) {
-		page_start = page_offset(pages[index]);
-		if (!end) {
-			start = page_start;
-			end = start + PAGE_SIZE - 1;
-			first_index = index;
-		} else if (end + 1 == page_start) {
-			end += PAGE_SIZE;
-		} else {
-			__do_contiguous_readpages(tree, &pages[first_index],
-						  index - first_index, start,
-						  end, em_cached,
-						  bio, bio_flags,
-						  prev_em_start);
-			start = page_start;
-			end = start + PAGE_SIZE - 1;
-			first_index = index;
-		}
-	}
-
-	if (end)
-		__do_contiguous_readpages(tree, &pages[first_index],
-					  index - first_index, start,
-					  end, em_cached, bio,
-					  bio_flags, prev_em_start);
-}
-
 static int __extent_read_full_page(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 				   struct page *page,
 				   get_extent_t *get_extent,
@@ -4098,6 +4058,8 @@ int extent_readpages(struct address_space *mapping, struct list_head *pages,
 	u64 prev_em_start = (u64)-1;
 
 	while (!list_empty(pages)) {
+		u64 contig_end = 0;
+
 		for (nr = 0; nr < ARRAY_SIZE(pagepool) && !list_empty(pages);) {
 			struct page *page = lru_to_page(pages);
 
@@ -4106,14 +4068,22 @@ int extent_readpages(struct address_space *mapping, struct list_head *pages,
 			if (add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, page->index,
 						readahead_gfp_mask(mapping))) {
 				put_page(page);
-				continue;
+				break;
 			}
 
 			pagepool[nr++] = page;
+			contig_end = page_offset(page) + PAGE_SIZE - 1;
 		}
 
-		__extent_readpages(tree, pagepool, nr, &em_cached, &bio,
-				   &bio_flags, &prev_em_start);
+		if (nr) {
+			u64 contig_start = page_offset(pagepool[0]);
+
+			ASSERT(contig_start + (nr*PAGE_SIZE) - 1 == contig_end);
+
+			contiguous_readpages(tree, pagepool, nr, contig_start,
+				     contig_end, &em_cached, &bio, &bio_flags,
+				     &prev_em_start);
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (em_cached)
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2019-03-11  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-11  7:55 Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-03-13 17:27 ` [PATCH] btrfs: Exploit the fact pages passed to extent_readpages are always contiguous David Sterba
2019-03-14  7:17   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 16:41     ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190311075538.19242-1-nborisov@suse.com \
    --to=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).