linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yoon Jungyeon <jungyeon@gatech.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: tree-checker: Enhance chunk checker to validate chunk profiler
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:55:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190313085511.23540-5-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190313085511.23540-1-wqu@suse.com>

Btrfs-progs already has comprehensive type checker, to ensure there is
only 0 (SINGLE profile) or 1 (DUP/RAID0/1/5/6/10) bit set for chunk
profile bits.

Do the same work for kernel.

Reported-by: Yoon Jungyeon <jungyeon@gatech.edu>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202765
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index 5ccb4be583ea..c08609627720 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -551,6 +551,13 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 		return -EUCLEAN;
 	}
 
+	if (!is_power_of_2(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) &&
+	    (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) != 0) {
+		chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
+		"invalid chunk profile flag: 0x%llx, expect 0 or 1 bit set",
+			  type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK);
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
 	if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) == 0) {
 		chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
 			  "missing chunk type flag: 0x%llx", type);
-- 
2.21.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-13  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-13  8:55 [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: Enhance tree checker and runtime checker to handle the new wave of fuzzed image attack Qu Wenruo
2019-03-13  8:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: tree-checker: Verify chunk items Qu Wenruo
2019-03-13  9:19   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-19 14:50   ` David Sterba
2019-03-20  0:46     ` Qu Wenruo
2019-03-20  5:03       ` Qu Wenruo
2019-03-13  8:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: tree-checker: Verify dev item Qu Wenruo
2019-03-13  9:19   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-13  8:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: Check the first key and level for cached extent buffer Qu Wenruo
2019-03-13  9:24   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-13  8:55 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-03-13  9:18   ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: tree-checker: Enhance chunk checker to validate chunk profiler Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-13  8:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: tree-checker: Verify inode item Qu Wenruo
2019-03-13  9:28   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-13  8:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer dereference Qu Wenruo
2019-03-13  9:41   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-13  9:01 ` [PATCH 0/6] btrfs: Enhance tree checker and runtime checker to handle the new wave of fuzzed image attack Qu Wenruo
2019-03-19 15:34   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190313085511.23540-5-wqu@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=jungyeon@gatech.edu \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).