From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: reloc: Fix NULL pointer dereference due to expanded reloc_root lifespan
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:48:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190318024819.18716-1-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
Commit 514e70150b60 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after
merge_reloc_roots()") expands the life span of root->reloc_root.
This breaks certain check on fs_info->reloc_ctl.
Before that commit, if we have a root with valid reloc_root, then it's
ensured to have fs_info->reloc_ctl.
But now since reloc_root doesn't always mean a valid fs_info->reloc_ctl,
such check is unreliable and can cause the following NULL pointer
dereference:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000005c1
IP: btrfs_reloc_pre_snapshot+0x20/0x50 [btrfs]
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 10379 Comm: snapperd Not tainted 4.12.14-lp150.12.53-default #1 openSUSE Leap 15.0
Call Trace:
create_pending_snapshot+0xd7/0xfc0 [btrfs]
create_pending_snapshots+0x8e/0xb0 [btrfs]
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x2ac/0x8f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_mksubvol+0x561/0x570 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x189/0x190 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x102/0x150 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0x5c9/0x1e60 [btrfs]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x90/0x5f0
SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x80
do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x150
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
RIP: 0033:0x7fd7cdab8467
Fix it by explicitly checking fs_info->reloc_ctl other than using the
implied root->reloc_root.
Fixes: 514e70150b60 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots()")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index ddf028509931..351fa506dc9b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -4667,14 +4667,12 @@ int btrfs_reloc_cow_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
void btrfs_reloc_pre_snapshot(struct btrfs_pending_snapshot *pending,
u64 *bytes_to_reserve)
{
- struct btrfs_root *root;
- struct reloc_control *rc;
+ struct btrfs_root *root = pending->root;
+ struct reloc_control *rc = root->fs_info->reloc_ctl;
- root = pending->root;
- if (!root->reloc_root)
+ if (!root->reloc_root || !rc)
return;
- rc = root->fs_info->reloc_ctl;
if (!rc->merge_reloc_tree)
return;
@@ -4703,10 +4701,10 @@ int btrfs_reloc_post_snapshot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root = pending->root;
struct btrfs_root *reloc_root;
struct btrfs_root *new_root;
- struct reloc_control *rc;
+ struct reloc_control *rc = root->fs_info->reloc_ctl;
int ret;
- if (!root->reloc_root)
+ if (!root->reloc_root || !rc)
return 0;
rc = root->fs_info->reloc_ctl;
--
2.21.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-18 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-18 2:48 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-03-19 17:59 ` [PATCH] btrfs: reloc: Fix NULL pointer dereference due to expanded reloc_root lifespan David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190318024819.18716-1-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox