From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/12] btrfs: Switch btrfs_trim_free_extents to find_first_clear_extent_bit
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:31:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190325123132.27835-13-nborisov@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190325123132.27835-1-nborisov@suse.com>
Instead of always calling the allocator to search for a free extent,
that satisfies the input criteria, switch btrfs_trim_free_extents to
using find_first_clear_extent_bit. With this change it's no longer
necessary to read the device tree in order to figure out holes in
the devices.
Now the code always searches in-memory data structure to figure out the
space range which contains the requested which should result in speed
oups.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 89 ++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 503d68ba3f6a..7961038e6d08 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -11249,54 +11249,6 @@ int btrfs_error_unpin_extent_range(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
return unpin_extent_range(fs_info, start, end, false);
}
-static bool should_skip_trim(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 *start, u64 *len)
-{
- u64 trimmed_start = 0, trimmed_end = 0;
- u64 end = *start + *len - 1;
-
- if (!find_first_extent_bit(&device->alloc_state, *start, &trimmed_start,
- &trimmed_end, CHUNK_TRIMMED, NULL)) {
- u64 trimmed_len = trimmed_end - trimmed_start + 1;
-
- if (*start < trimmed_start) {
- if (in_range(end, trimmed_start, trimmed_len) ||
- end > trimmed_end) {
- /*
- * start|------|end
- * ts|--|trimmed_len
- * OR
- * start|-----|end
- * ts|-----|trimmed_len
- */
- *len = trimmed_start - *start;
- return false;
- } else if (end < trimmed_start) {
- /*
- * start|------|end
- * ts|--|trimmed_len
- */
- return false;
- }
- } else if (in_range(*start, trimmed_start, trimmed_len)) {
- if (in_range(end, trimmed_start, trimmed_len)) {
- /*
- * start|------|end
- * ts|----------|trimmed_len
- */
- return true;
- } else {
- /*
- * start|-----------|end
- * ts|----------|trimmed_len
- */
- *start = trimmed_end + 1;
- *len = end - *start + 1;
- return false;
- }
- }
- }
- return false;
-}
/*
* It used to be that old block groups would be left around forever.
* Iterating over them would be enough to trim unused space. Since we
@@ -11320,7 +11272,7 @@ static bool should_skip_trim(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 *start, u64 *len)
static int btrfs_trim_free_extents(struct btrfs_device *device,
struct fstrim_range *range, u64 *trimmed)
{
- u64 start = range->start, len = 0;
+ u64 start = max_t(u64, range->start, SZ_1M), len = 0, end = 0;
int ret;
*trimmed = 0;
@@ -11347,34 +11299,45 @@ static int btrfs_trim_free_extents(struct btrfs_device *device,
if (ret)
break;
- ret = find_free_dev_extent_start(device, range->minlen, start,
- &start, &len);
+ find_first_clear_extent_bit(&device->alloc_state, start,
+ &start, &end,
+ CHUNK_TRIMMED | CHUNK_ALLOCATED);
+ /* If find_first_clear_extent_bit find a range that spans the
+ * end of the device it will set end to -1, in this case it's up
+ * to the caller to trim the value to the size of the device.
+ */
+ end = min(end, device->total_bytes);
+ len = end - start + 1;
- if (ret) {
+ /* We didn't find any extents */
+ if (!len) {
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
- if (ret == -ENOSPC)
- ret = 0;
+ ret = 0;
break;
}
+ /* Keep going until we satisfy minlen or reach end of space */
+ if (len < range->minlen) {
+ mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+ start += len;
+ continue;
+ }
+
/* If we are out of the passed range break */
if (start > range->start + range->len - 1) {
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
- ret = 0;
break;
}
start = max(range->start, start);
len = min(range->len, len);
- if (!should_skip_trim(device, &start, &len)) {
- ret = btrfs_issue_discard(device->bdev, start, len,
- &bytes);
- if (!ret)
- set_extent_bits(&device->alloc_state, start,
- start + bytes - 1,
- CHUNK_TRIMMED);
- }
+ ret = btrfs_issue_discard(device->bdev, start, len,
+ &bytes);
+ if (!ret)
+ set_extent_bits(&device->alloc_state, start,
+ start + bytes - 1,
+ CHUNK_TRIMMED);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
if (ret)
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-25 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-25 12:31 [PATCH v3 00/12] FITRIM improvements Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] btrfs: Honour FITRIM range constraints during free space trim Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] btrfs: combine device update operations during transaction commit Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 13:44 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] btrfs: Handle pending/pinned chunks before blockgroup relocation during device shrink Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 15:09 ` David Sterba
2019-03-25 15:16 ` David Sterba
2019-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] btrfs: Rename and export clear_btree_io_tree Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] btrfs: Populate ->orig_block_len during read_one_chunk Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] btrfs: Introduce new bits for device allocation tree Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 16:12 ` David Sterba
2019-03-25 16:13 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] btrfs: replace pending/pinned chunks lists with io tree Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 14:22 ` David Sterba
2019-03-25 16:26 ` David Sterba
2019-03-25 16:43 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 16:57 ` David Sterba
2019-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] btrfs: Remove 'trans' argument from find_free_dev_extent(_start) Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] btrfs: Factor out in_range macro Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] btrfs: Optimize unallocated chunks discard Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 16:29 ` David Sterba
2019-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] btrfs: Implement find_first_clear_extent_bit Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-25 12:31 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-03-25 18:44 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] FITRIM improvements Darrick J. Wong
2019-03-26 8:09 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-26 10:50 ` Filipe Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190325123132.27835-13-nborisov@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox