From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Linux BTRFS Mailinglist <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Gstir <david@sigma-star.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] btrfs: Simplify btrfs_check_super_csum() and get rid of size assumptions
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 15:23:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521132321.GD7200@x250> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d61314d-246d-ee95-1643-5c4cc2c5e919@suse.com>
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 04:01:36PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 16.05.19 г. 11:47 ч., Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > Now that we have already checked for a valid checksum type before calling
> > btrfs_check_super_csum(), it can be simplified even further.
> >
> > While at it get rid of the implicit size assumption of the resulting
> > checksum as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> >
> > ---
> > Changes to v1:
> > - Check for disk_sb->csum instead of raw buffer (Nikolay)
> > ---
> > fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 37 +++++++++++++------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> > index 74937effaed4..edb8bc79b01b 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> > @@ -375,33 +375,22 @@ static int btrfs_check_super_csum(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> > {
>
> This function no longer requires the btrfs_fs_info argument so it should
> be removed. While on the topic of refactoring this function - why not
> change it's return type to bool since it can't return anything other
> than 0/1 ?
Patch 11/13 will need fs_info again.
--
Johannes Thumshirn SUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumshirn@suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-16 8:47 [PATCH v2 00/13] Add support for SHA-256 checksums Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-16 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] btrfs: use btrfs_csum_data() instead of directly calling crc32c Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-16 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] btrfs: resurrect btrfs_crc32c() Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-16 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] btrfs: use btrfs_crc32c{,_final}() in for free space cache Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-16 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] btrfs: don't assume ordered sums to be 4 bytes Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-21 12:42 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-21 13:10 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-21 13:14 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-16 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] btrfs: dont assume compressed_bio " Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-21 12:56 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-21 13:00 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-16 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] btrfs: format checksums according to type for printing Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-16 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] btrfs: add common checksum type validation Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-21 14:04 ` David Sterba
2019-05-16 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] btrfs: check for supported superblock checksum type before checksum validation Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-21 12:58 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-21 14:06 ` David Sterba
2019-05-16 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] btrfs: Simplify btrfs_check_super_csum() and get rid of size assumptions Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-21 13:01 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-21 13:23 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2019-05-16 8:48 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] btrfs: add boilerplate code for directly including the crypto framework Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-21 14:11 ` David Sterba
2019-05-16 8:48 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] btrfs: directly call into crypto framework for checsumming Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-21 14:22 ` David Sterba
2019-05-22 8:06 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-16 8:48 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] btrfs: remove assumption about csum type form btrfs_print_data_csum_error() Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-21 13:02 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-16 8:48 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] btrfs: add sha256 as another checksum algorithm Johannes Thumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190521132321.GD7200@x250 \
--to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=david@sigma-star.at \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).