From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: fdmanana@kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: fix wrong ctime and mtime of a directory after log replay
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 19:19:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190528171924.GV15290@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190515150247.24776-1-fdmanana@kernel.org>
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 04:02:47PM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
>
> When replaying a log that contains a new file or directory name that needs
> to be added to its parent directory, we end up updating the mtime and the
> ctime of the parent directory to the current time after we have set their
> values to the correct ones (set at fsync time), efectivelly losing them.
>
> Sample reproducer:
>
> $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
> $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
>
> $ mkdir /mnt/dir
> $ touch /mnt/dir/file
>
> # fsync of the directory is optional, not needed
> $ xfs_io -c fsync /mnt/dir
> $ xfs_io -c fsync /mnt/dir/file
>
> $ stat -c %Y /mnt/dir
> 1557856079
>
> <power failure>
>
> $ sleep 3
> $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
> $ stat -c %Y /mnt/dir
> 1557856082
>
> --> should have been 1557856079, the mtime is updated to the current
> time when replaying the log
>
> Fix this by not updating the mtime and ctime to the current time at
> btrfs_add_link() when we are replaying a log tree.
>
> This could be triggered by my recent fsync fuzz tester for fstests, for
> which an fstests patch exists titled "fstests: generic, fsync fuzz tester
> with fsstress".
>
> Fixes: e02119d5a7b43 ("Btrfs: Add a write ahead tree log to optimize synchronous operations")
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Added to 5.2-rc queue, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-28 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-15 15:02 [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: fix wrong ctime and mtime of a directory after log replay fdmanana
2019-05-16 7:09 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-28 17:19 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190528171924.GV15290@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox