linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Harvey <jamespharvey20@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] btrfs: inode: Don't compress if NODATASUM or NODATACOW set
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:15:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627061517.2112-1-wqu@suse.com> (raw)

As btrfs(5) specified:

	Note
	If nodatacow or nodatasum are enabled, compression is disabled.

If NODATASUM or NODATACOW set, we should not compress the extent.

Normally NODATACOW is detected properly in run_delalloc_range() so
compression won't happen for NODATACOW.

However for NODATASUM we don't have any check, and it can cause
compressed extent without csum pretty easily, just by:

  mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
  mount $dev $mnt -o nodatasum
  touch $mnt/foobar
  mount -o remount,datasum,compress $mnt
  xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 128K" $mnt/foobar

And in fact, we have bug report about corrupted compressed extent
without proper data checksum so even RAID1 can't recover the corruption.
(https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199707)

Running compression without proper checksum could cause more damage when
corruption happens, so there is no need to allow compression for
NODATACSUM.

Reported-by: James Harvey <jamespharvey20@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index a2aabdb85226..4e0c7f18fa3a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -398,6 +398,14 @@ static inline int inode_need_compress(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end)
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
 
+	/*
+	 * Btrfs doesn't support compression without csum or CoW.
+	 * This should have the highest priority.
+	 */
+	if (BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW ||
+	    BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM)
+		return 0;
+
 	/* force compress */
 	if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, FORCE_COMPRESS))
 		return 1;
-- 
2.22.0


                 reply	other threads:[~2019-06-27  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190627061517.2112-1-wqu@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=jamespharvey20@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).