From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] btrfs-progs: tests: Make 64K page size system happier
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:49:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190722164915.GA22308@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190705072651.25150-1-wqu@suse.com>
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 03:26:46PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Since I got another rockpro64, finally I could do some tests with
> aarch64 64K page size mode. (The first board is working as a NAS for
> a while)
>
> Unsurprisingly there are several false test alerts in btrfs-progs
> selftests.
>
> Although there is no existing CI service based on 64K page sized system,
> we'd better support for 64K page size as it's easier and easier to get
> SBC with good enough aarch64 SoC to compile kernel/btrfs-progs and run
> various tests on them.
>
> The first patch fix a bug which mkfs can't accept any sector size on 64K
> page size system.
>
> The remaining patches enhance test cases to make them work on 64K page
> size system (skip those tests unless kernel support subpage sized sector
> size)
>
> Qu Wenruo (5):
> btrfs-progs: mkfs: Apply the sectorsize user specified on 64k page
> size system
> btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: Check if current kernel can mount fs with
> specified sector size
> btrfs-progs: mkfs-tests: Skip 010-minimal-size if we can't mount with
> 4k sector size
> btrfs-progs: misc-tests: Make test cases work or skipped on 64K page
> size system
> btrfs-progs: convert-tests: Skip tests if kernel doesn't support
> subpage sized sector size
The fix is ok, but the test updates and pre-checks do not seem right to
me. The check_preerq helpers are for binaries and rather simple checks
unlike what the mkfs/mount test for 4k sectors does. I'll reply under
the patches with more specific comments.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-22 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-05 7:26 [PATCH 0/5] btrfs-progs: tests: Make 64K page size system happier Qu Wenruo
2019-07-05 7:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs-progs: mkfs: Apply the sectorsize user specified on 64k page size system Qu Wenruo
2019-07-05 7:45 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-07-05 8:38 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-07-05 7:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: Check if current kernel can mount fs with specified sector size Qu Wenruo
2019-07-22 17:07 ` David Sterba
2019-07-23 1:05 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-07-05 7:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs-progs: mkfs-tests: Skip 010-minimal-size if we can't mount with 4k " Qu Wenruo
2019-07-22 17:15 ` David Sterba
2019-07-23 1:08 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-07-05 7:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs-progs: misc-tests: Make test cases work or skipped on 64K page size system Qu Wenruo
2019-07-05 7:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs-progs: convert-tests: Skip tests if kernel doesn't support subpage sized sector size Qu Wenruo
2019-07-22 17:39 ` David Sterba
2019-07-22 16:49 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190722164915.GA22308@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox