linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jungyeon Yoon <jungyeon.yoon@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] btrfs: Enhanced runtime defence against fuzzed images
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:12:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190725061222.9581-1-wqu@suse.com> (raw)

Another wave of defence enhancment, including:

- Enhanced eb accessors
  Not really needed for the fuzzed images, as 448de471cd4c
  ("btrfs: Check the first key and level for cached extent buffer")
  already fixed half of the reported images.
  Just add a final layer of safe net.

  Just to complain here, two experienced btrfs developer have got
  confused by @start, @len in functions like read_extent_buffer() with
  logical address.
  The best example to solve the confusion is to check the
  read_extent_buffer() call in btree_read_extent_buffer_pages().

  I'm not sure why this confusion happens or even get spread.
  My guess is the extent_buffer::start naming causing the problem.

  If so, I would definitely rename extent_buffer::start to
  extent_buffer::bytenr at any cost.
  Hopes the new commend will address the problem for now.

- BUG_ON() hunt in __btrfs_free_extent()
  Kill BUG_ON()s in __btrfs_free_extent(), replace with error reporting
  and why it shouldn't happen.

  Also add comment on what __btrfs_free_extent() is designed to do, with
  two dump-tree examples for newcomers.

- BUG_ON() hunt in __btrfs_inc_extent_ref()
  Just like __btrfs_free_extent(), but less comment as
  comment for __btrfs_free_extent() should also work for
  __btrfs_inc_extent_ref(), and __btrfs_inc_extent_ref() has a better
  structure than __btrfs_free_extent().

- Defence against unbalanced empty leaf

- Defence against bad key order across two tree blocks

The last two cases can't be rejected by tree-checker and they are all
cross-eb cases.
Thankfully we can reuse existing first_key check against unbalanced
empty leaf, but needs extra check deep into ctree.c for tree block
merging time check.

Reported-by: Jungyeon Yoon <jungyeon.yoon@gmail.com>
[ Not to mail bombarding the report, thus only RB tag in cover letter ]

Changelog:
v2:
- Remove duplicated error message in WARN() call.
  Changed to WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG))
  Also move WARN() after btrfs error message.

- Fix a comment error in __btrfs_free_extent()
  It's not adding refs to a tree block, but adding the same refs
  to an existing tree block ref.
  It's impossible a btrfs tree owning the same tree block directly twice.

- Add comment for eb accessors about @start and @len
  If anyone could tell me why such confusion between @start @len and
  logical address is here, I will definitely solve the root cause no
  matter how many codes need to be modified.

- Use bool to replace int where only two values are returned
  Also rename to follow the bool type.

- Remove one unrelated change for the error handler in
  btrfs_inc_extent_ref()

- Add Reviewed-by tag

Qu Wenruo (5):
  btrfs: extent_io: Do extra check for extent buffer read write
    functions
  btrfs: extent-tree: Kill BUG_ON() in __btrfs_free_extent() and do
    better comment
  btrfs: Detect unbalanced tree with empty leaf before crashing btree
    operations
  btrfs: extent-tree: Kill the BUG_ON() in
    insert_inline_extent_backref()
  btrfs: ctree: Checking key orders before merged tree blocks

 fs/btrfs/ctree.c        |  68 +++++++++++++++++
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c      |   8 ++
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c  | 164 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c    |  76 ++++++++++---------
 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c |   6 ++
 5 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

-- 
2.22.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-07-25  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-25  6:12 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-07-25  6:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] btrfs: extent_io: Do extra check for extent buffer read write functions Qu Wenruo
2019-07-25  6:44   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-07-25  6:58     ` Qu Wenruo
2019-07-31 13:47       ` David Sterba
2019-07-25  6:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] btrfs: extent-tree: Kill BUG_ON() in __btrfs_free_extent() and do better comment Qu Wenruo
2019-07-25  8:39   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-07-25  9:31     ` Qu Wenruo
2019-07-30 14:59   ` kbuild test robot
2019-07-25  6:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] btrfs: Detect unbalanced tree with empty leaf before crashing btree operations Qu Wenruo
2019-07-25  9:26   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-07-25  9:34     ` Qu Wenruo
2019-08-06 13:58   ` David Sterba
2019-08-06 14:04     ` Qu Wenruo
2019-08-06 17:47       ` David Sterba
2019-08-07  2:22         ` Qu Wenruo
2019-08-07  6:08         ` Qu Wenruo
2019-07-25  6:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] btrfs: extent-tree: Kill the BUG_ON() in insert_inline_extent_backref() Qu Wenruo
2019-07-25 10:20   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-07-25  6:12 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] btrfs: ctree: Checking key orders before merged tree blocks Qu Wenruo
2019-07-25  6:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] btrfs: Enhanced runtime defence against fuzzed images Nikolay Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190725061222.9581-1-wqu@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=jungyeon.yoon@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).