From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: volumes: Allow missing devices to be writeable
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 19:17:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911171748.GI2850@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190829071731.11521-1-wqu@suse.com>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 03:17:31PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [BUG]
> There is a long existing bug that degraded mounted btrfs can allocate new
> SINGLE/DUP chunks on a RAID1 fs:
> #!/bin/bash
>
> dev1=/dev/test/scratch1
> dev2=/dev/test/scratch2
> mnt=/mnt/btrfs
>
> umount $mnt &> /dev/null
> umount $dev1 &> /dev/null
> umount $dev2 &> /dev/null
>
> dmesg -C
> mkfs.btrfs -f -m raid1 -d raid1 $dev1 $dev2
>
> wipefs -fa $dev2
>
> mount -o degraded $dev1 $mnt
> btrfs balance start --full $mnt
> umount $mnt
> echo "=== chunk after degraded mount ==="
> btrfs ins dump-tree -t chunk $dev1 | grep stripe_len.*type
>
> The result fs will have chunks with SINGLE and DUP only:
> === chunk after degraded mount ===
> length 33554432 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type SYSTEM
> length 1073741824 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA
> length 1073741824 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|DUP
> length 219676672 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type METADATA|DUP
> length 33554432 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type SYSTEM|DUP
>
> This behavior greatly breaks the RAID1 tolerance.
>
> Even with missing device replaced, if the device with DUP/SINGLE chunks
> on them get missing, the whole fs can't be mounted RW any more.
> And we already have reports that user even can't mount the fs as some
> essential tree blocks got written to those DUP chunks.
>
> [CAUSE]
> The cause is pretty simple, we treat missing devices as non-writable.
> Thus when we need to allocate chunks, we can only fall back to single
> device profiles (SINGLE and DUP).
>
> [FIX]
> Just consider the missing devices as WRITABLE, so we allocate new chunks
> on them to maintain old profiles.
I'm not sure this is the best way to fix it, it makes the meaning of
rw_devices ambiguous. A missing device is by definition not readable nor
writeable.
This should be tracked separatelly, ie. counting real devices that can
be written and devices that can be considered for allocation (with a
documented meaning that even missing devices are included).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-29 7:17 [PATCH] btrfs: volumes: Allow missing devices to be writeable Qu Wenruo
2019-09-11 17:17 ` David Sterba [this message]
2019-09-11 23:39 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-09-12 10:27 ` Anand Jain
2019-09-12 10:32 ` WenRuo Qu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190911171748.GI2850@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox