From: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix balance convert to single on 32-bit host CPUs
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 00:59:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190914045928.GN22121@hungrycats.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7af81c39-d31a-1888-e7f3-615fa0eba877@suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2146 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:24:08AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 13/09/2019 01:55, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> > Currently, the command:
> >
> > btrfs balance start -dconvert=single,soft .
> >
> > on a Raspberry Pi produces the following kernel message:
> >
> > BTRFS error (device mmcblk0p2): balance: invalid convert data profile single
> >
> > This fails because we use is_power_of_2(unsigned long) to validate
> > the new data profile, the constant for 'single' profile uses bit 48,
> > and there are only 32 bits in a long on ARM.
> >
> > Fix by open-coding the check using u64 variables.
> >
> > Tested by completing the original balance command on several Raspberry
> > Pis.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
> > ---
> > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > index 88a323a453d8..252c6049c6b7 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > @@ -3906,7 +3906,11 @@ static int alloc_profile_is_valid(u64 flags, int extended)
> > return !extended; /* "0" is valid for usual profiles */
> >
> > /* true if exactly one bit set */
> > - return is_power_of_2(flags);
> > + /*
> > + * Don't use is_power_of_2(unsigned long) because it won't work
> > + * for the single profile (1ULL << 48) on 32-bit CPUs.
> > + */
> > + return flags != 0 && (flags & (flags - 1)) == 0;
>
> Would
> flags && IS_ALIGNED(flags)
>
> Work as well? IS_ALIGNED() should be type-save due to the typeof():
> #define IS_ALIGNED(x, a) (((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0)
>
> Or maybe I'm missing something subtle?
Wouldn't that be
flags && IS_ALIGNED(flags, flags)
?
> Thanks,
> Johannes
> --
> Johannes Thumshirn SUSE Labs Filesystems
> jthumshirn@suse.de +49 911 74053 689
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> Maxfeldstr. 5
> 90409 Nürnberg
> Germany
> (HRB 247165, AG München)
> Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-14 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-12 23:55 [PATCH] btrfs: fix balance convert to single on 32-bit host CPUs Zygo Blaxell
2019-09-13 8:24 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-09-14 4:59 ` Zygo Blaxell [this message]
2019-09-16 7:44 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-09-13 16:14 ` Josef Bacik
2019-09-14 4:59 ` Zygo Blaxell
2019-09-14 9:20 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-09-23 15:14 ` David Sterba
2019-10-01 17:36 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190914045928.GN22121@hungrycats.org \
--to=ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox