From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] btrfs-progs: Support for BG_TREE feature
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:17:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191014151723.GP2751@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191008044936.157873-1-wqu@suse.com>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 12:49:29PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> This patchset can be fetched from github:
> https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/bg_tree
> Which is based on v5.2.2 tag.
>
> This patchset provides the needed user space infrastructure for BG_TREE
> feature.
>
> Since it's an new incompatible feature, unlike SKINNY_METADATA, btrfs-progs
> is needed to convert existing fs (unmounted) to new format.
>
> Now btrfstune can convert regular extent tree fs to bg tree fs to
> improve mount time.
Have we settled the argument whether to use a new tree or key tricks for
the blocgroup data? I think we have not and will read the previous
discussions. For a feature like this I want to be sure we understand all
the pros and cons.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-14 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-08 4:49 [PATCH v2 0/7] btrfs-progs: Support for BG_TREE feature Qu Wenruo
2019-10-08 4:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] btrfs-progs: Refactor excluded extent functions to use fs_info Qu Wenruo
2019-10-08 9:22 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-10-17 2:16 ` Anand Jain
2019-10-08 4:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] btrfs-progs: Refactor btrfs_read_block_groups() Qu Wenruo
2019-10-17 3:23 ` Anand Jain
2019-10-17 4:33 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-10-17 5:08 ` Anand Jain
2019-10-08 4:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] btrfs-progs: Enable read-write ability for 'bg_tree' feature Qu Wenruo
2019-10-17 4:56 ` Anand Jain
2019-10-08 4:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] btrfs-progs: mkfs: Introduce -O bg-tree Qu Wenruo
2019-10-08 8:16 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Qu Wenruo
2019-10-08 4:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] btrfs-progs: dump-tree/dump-super: Introduce support for bg tree Qu Wenruo
2019-10-08 4:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] btrfs-progs: check: Introduce support for bg-tree feature Qu Wenruo
2019-10-08 4:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] btrfs-progs: btrfstune: Allow to enable bg-tree feature offline Qu Wenruo
2019-10-17 4:17 ` Anand Jain
2019-10-17 4:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-10-14 15:17 ` David Sterba [this message]
2019-10-15 0:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] btrfs-progs: Support for BG_TREE feature Qu Wenruo
2019-10-16 11:16 ` David Sterba
2019-10-16 11:19 ` Qu WenRuo
2019-10-18 17:27 ` David Sterba
2019-10-19 0:04 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-10-21 15:44 ` David Sterba
2019-10-22 0:49 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-10-22 6:30 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-10-22 12:23 ` David Sterba
2019-10-22 12:27 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191014151723.GP2751@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox