From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 5/7] btrfs-progs: Refactor btrfs_new_block_group_record() to accept parameters directly
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 20:03:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191104120401.56408-6-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191104120401.56408-1-wqu@suse.com>
Currently btrfs_new_block_group_record() needs to extract numbers from
key and block group item manually.
This is not generic enough to handle skinny-bg-tree feature.
So change let btrfs_new_block_group_record() to accept @bytenr, @len and
@flags directly, so later skinny-bg-tree feature can reuse it in
original mode.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
btrfsck.h | 4 ++--
check/common.h | 4 ++--
check/main.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
cmds/rescue-chunk-recover.c | 6 +++++-
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btrfsck.h b/btrfsck.h
index ac7f5d488b5a..be811a133687 100644
--- a/btrfsck.h
+++ b/btrfsck.h
@@ -189,8 +189,8 @@ struct chunk_record *btrfs_new_chunk_record(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
struct btrfs_key *key,
int slot);
struct block_group_record *
-btrfs_new_block_group_record(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
- int slot);
+btrfs_new_block_group_record(struct extent_buffer *leaf, u64 bytenr, u64 len,
+ u64 flags);
struct device_extent_record *
btrfs_new_device_extent_record(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
struct btrfs_key *key, int slot);
diff --git a/check/common.h b/check/common.h
index 62cdc1d934c7..ff206f27c304 100644
--- a/check/common.h
+++ b/check/common.h
@@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ struct chunk_record *btrfs_new_chunk_record(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
struct btrfs_key *key,
int slot);
struct block_group_record *
-btrfs_new_block_group_record(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
- int slot);
+btrfs_new_block_group_record(struct extent_buffer *leaf, u64 bytenr, u64 len,
+ u64 flags);
struct device_extent_record *
btrfs_new_device_extent_record(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
struct btrfs_key *key, int slot);
diff --git a/check/main.c b/check/main.c
index a0e5ac47c152..a1261ce0ebe7 100644
--- a/check/main.c
+++ b/check/main.c
@@ -5193,10 +5193,9 @@ static int process_device_item(struct rb_root *dev_cache,
}
struct block_group_record *
-btrfs_new_block_group_record(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
- int slot)
+btrfs_new_block_group_record(struct extent_buffer *leaf, u64 bytenr, u64 len,
+ u64 flags)
{
- struct btrfs_block_group_item *ptr;
struct block_group_record *rec;
rec = calloc(1, sizeof(*rec));
@@ -5205,17 +5204,15 @@ btrfs_new_block_group_record(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
exit(-1);
}
- rec->cache.start = key->objectid;
- rec->cache.size = key->offset;
+ rec->cache.start = bytenr;
+ rec->cache.size = len;
rec->generation = btrfs_header_generation(leaf);
- rec->objectid = key->objectid;
- rec->type = key->type;
- rec->offset = key->offset;
-
- ptr = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_block_group_item);
- rec->flags = btrfs_disk_block_group_flags(leaf, ptr);
+ rec->objectid = bytenr;
+ rec->type = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY;
+ rec->offset = len;
+ rec->flags = flags;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rec->list);
@@ -5226,10 +5223,14 @@ static int process_block_group_item(struct block_group_tree *block_group_cache,
struct btrfs_key *key,
struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot)
{
+ struct btrfs_block_group_item bgi;
struct block_group_record *rec;
int ret = 0;
- rec = btrfs_new_block_group_record(eb, key, slot);
+ read_extent_buffer(eb, &bgi, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, slot),
+ sizeof(bgi));
+ rec = btrfs_new_block_group_record(eb, key->objectid, key->offset,
+ btrfs_block_group_flags(&bgi));
ret = insert_block_group_record(block_group_cache, rec);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "Block Group[%llu, %llu] existed.\n",
diff --git a/cmds/rescue-chunk-recover.c b/cmds/rescue-chunk-recover.c
index 22d7a5959531..cd575668f89e 100644
--- a/cmds/rescue-chunk-recover.c
+++ b/cmds/rescue-chunk-recover.c
@@ -226,12 +226,16 @@ static int process_block_group_item(struct block_group_tree *bg_cache,
struct extent_buffer *leaf,
struct btrfs_key *key, int slot)
{
+ struct btrfs_block_group_item bgi;
struct block_group_record *rec;
struct block_group_record *exist;
struct cache_extent *cache;
int ret = 0;
- rec = btrfs_new_block_group_record(leaf, key, slot);
+ read_extent_buffer(leaf, &bgi, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, slot),
+ sizeof(bgi));
+ rec = btrfs_new_block_group_record(leaf, key->objectid, key->offset,
+ btrfs_block_group_flags(&bgi));
if (!rec->cache.size)
goto free_out;
again:
--
2.23.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-04 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-04 12:03 [PATCH RFC 0/7] Qu Wenruo
2019-11-04 12:03 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] btrfs-progs: check/lowmem: Lookup block group item in a seperate function Qu Wenruo
2019-11-04 12:03 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] btrfs-progs: Enable read-write ability for 'skinny_bg_tree' feature Qu Wenruo
2019-11-04 12:03 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] btrfs-progs: mkfs: Introduce -O skinny-bg-tree Qu Wenruo
2019-11-04 12:03 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] btrfs-progs: dump-tree/dump-super: Introduce support for skinny bg tree Qu Wenruo
2019-11-04 12:03 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-11-04 12:04 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] btrfs-progs: check: Introduce support for bg-tree feature Qu Wenruo
2019-11-04 12:04 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] btrfs-progs: btrfstune: Allow to enable bg-tree feature offline Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191104120401.56408-6-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox