From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] btrfs: locking: add lock assertions
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 11:31:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191105103149.GJ3001@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86d6b97f9a9f09b8ac2d1773295fbb1176e5a73a.1572432768.git.dsterba@suse.com>
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:57:06AM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> Add assertions to locking functions where the we expect the lock to be
> held. This must also respect the nesting, so write lock checks 'write'
> while read lock only if the lock is held.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/locking.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> index 571c4826c428..147bf5d41962 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static void btrfs_assert_tree_write_locks_put(struct extent_buffer *eb) { }
> */
> void btrfs_set_lock_blocking_read(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> {
> + lockdep_assert_held(&eb->lock);
> trace_btrfs_set_lock_blocking_read(eb);
> /*
> * No lock is required. The lock owner may change if we have a read
> @@ -219,6 +220,7 @@ void btrfs_set_lock_blocking_read(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> */
> void btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> {
> + lockdep_assert_held_write(&eb->lock);
This is "a bit noisy" during the self-tests, I'll have to investigate
why so this patch is on hold.
> trace_btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(eb);
> /*
> * No lock is required. The lock owner may change if we have a read
> @@ -358,6 +360,7 @@ int btrfs_try_tree_write_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> */
> void btrfs_tree_read_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> {
> + lockdep_assert_held(&eb->lock);
> trace_btrfs_tree_read_unlock(eb);
> /*
> * if we're nested, we have the write lock. No new locking
> --
> 2.23.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-05 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-30 10:56 [PATCH v2 0/5] Extent buffer locking and documentation David Sterba
2019-10-30 10:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] btrfs: merge blocking_writers branches in btrfs_tree_read_lock David Sterba
2019-10-31 10:22 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-10-30 10:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] btrfs: set blocking_writers directly, no increment or decrement David Sterba
2019-10-30 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] btrfs: access eb::blocking_writers according to ACCESS_ONCE policies David Sterba
2019-10-30 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] btrfs: document extent buffer locking David Sterba
2019-10-30 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] btrfs: locking: add lock assertions David Sterba
2019-11-05 10:31 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191105103149.GJ3001@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox