From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: Wait for extent bits to release page
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:56:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191115165627.GE26016@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191115161700.12305-8-rgoldwyn@suse.de>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:17:00AM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
>
> While trying to release a page, the extent containing the page may be locked
> which would stop the page from being released. Wait for the
> extent lock to be cleared, if blocking is allowed and then clear
> the bits.
>
> This is avoid warnings coming iomap->dio_rw() ->
> invalidate_inode_pages2_range() -> invalidate_complete_page2() ->
> try_to_release_page() results in stale pagecache warning.
I can't really comment on the technical aspects of this patch as I don't
know btrfs well enough for that, but try_release_extent_state already
is written in a rather convoluted way, and the additions in this patch
don't make that any better.
I think we want something like the version below. I can also send you
a patch with just the cleanup bits, so that you can add the actual
changes on top.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index cceaf05aada2..4dc4b4c57d7c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -4367,28 +4367,24 @@ static int try_release_extent_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
{
u64 start = page_offset(page);
u64 end = start + PAGE_SIZE - 1;
- int ret = 1;
if (test_range_bit(tree, start, end, EXTENT_LOCKED, 0, NULL)) {
- ret = 0;
- } else {
- /*
- * at this point we can safely clear everything except the
- * locked bit and the nodatasum bit
- */
- ret = __clear_extent_bit(tree, start, end,
- ~(EXTENT_LOCKED | EXTENT_NODATASUM),
- 0, 0, NULL, mask, NULL);
-
- /* if clear_extent_bit failed for enomem reasons,
- * we can't allow the release to continue.
- */
- if (ret < 0)
- ret = 0;
- else
- ret = 1;
+ if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(mask))
+ return 0;
+ wait_extent_bit(tree, start, end, EXTENT_LOCKED);
}
- return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * At this point we can safely clear everything except the locked and
+ * nodatasum bits. But if clear_extent_bit failed because we are out
+ * of memory, we can't allow the release to continue.
+ */
+ if (__clear_extent_bit(tree, start, end,
+ ~(EXTENT_LOCKED | EXTENT_NODATASUM), 0, 0, NULL,
+ mask, NULL) < 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
}
/*
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-15 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-15 16:16 btrfs direct-io using iomap Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-11-15 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/7] fs: Export generic_file_buffered_read() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-11-15 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: basic direct I/O read operation Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-11-15 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-15 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/7] iomap: use a function pointer for dio submits Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-11-15 16:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-15 20:11 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-11-15 16:16 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: Use iomap_dio_rw() for direct I/O Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-11-15 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-18 15:54 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-11-18 16:54 ` Filipe Manana
2019-11-19 17:01 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-11-19 17:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-11-15 16:16 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: Use iomap_dio_ops.submit_io() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-11-15 16:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-15 16:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: flush dirty pages on compressed I/O for dio Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-11-15 16:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-15 16:17 ` [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: Wait for extent bits to release page Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-11-15 16:56 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191115165627.GE26016@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).