From: damenly.su@gmail.com
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/11] btrfs-progs: handle split-brain scenario for scanned changing device without INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 19:01:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191212110204.11128-5-Damenly_Su@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191212110204.11128-1-Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
From: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
For a scanned changing device without INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID, the
situation may be
a) The scanned failed to be pull into disk, and there are successful
synced devices which is already in fs_devices->devices. So their
fsid and metadata_uuid must differ. Also since the scanned device is
without INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID, so fs_device->metadata_uuid must equals
disk_super->fs_id.
b) The scanned device is in the newest state. There are some old
devices failed to be with CHANGING_FSID_V2 or some devices just like
the device.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
---
volumes.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
index 88e926e98d5b..bc1726975ce4 100644
--- a/volumes.c
+++ b/volumes.c
@@ -205,18 +205,46 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid(u8 *fsid, u8 *metadata_uuid)
return NULL;
}
+/*
+ * Handle scanned device which has CHANGING_FSID_V2 set, it might belong to
+ * either a filesystem which has disks with completed fsid change or it might
+ * belong to fs with no UUID changes in effect, handle both.
+ */
+static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid_inprogress(
+ struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super)
+{
+ struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, list) {
+ if (memcmp(fs_devices->metadata_uuid, fs_devices->fsid,
+ BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) != 0 &&
+ memcmp(fs_devices->metadata_uuid, disk_super->fsid,
+ BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0 && !fs_devices->fsid_change) {
+ return fs_devices;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return find_fsid(disk_super->fsid, NULL);
+}
+
static int device_list_add(const char *path,
struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super,
u64 devid, struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret)
{
struct btrfs_device *device;
- struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
+ struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = NULL;
u64 found_transid = btrfs_super_generation(disk_super);
bool metadata_uuid = (btrfs_super_incompat_flags(disk_super) &
BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID);
bool fsid_change_in_progress = (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) &
BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID_V2);
- if (metadata_uuid)
+
+ if (fsid_change_in_progress) {
+ if (!metadata_uuid)
+ fs_devices = find_fsid_inprogress(disk_super);
+ }
+
+ if (metadata_uuid && !fs_devices)
fs_devices = find_fsid(disk_super->fsid,
disk_super->metadata_uuid);
else
--
2.21.0 (Apple Git-122.2)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-12 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-12 11:01 [PATCH 00/11] btrfs-progs: metadata_uuid feature fixes and portation damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 01/11] btrfs-progs: misc-tests/034: reload btrfs module before running failure_recovery damenly.su
2020-01-31 8:01 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 02/11] btrfs-progs: misc-tests/034: mount the second device if first device mount failed damenly.su
2020-01-31 8:03 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-31 10:01 ` Su Yue
2020-01-31 12:47 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-02-04 4:40 ` Su Yue
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 03/11] btrfs-progs: metadata_uuid: add new member btrfs_fs_devices::fsid_change damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:01 ` damenly.su [this message]
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 05/11] btrfs-progs: handle split-brain scenario for scanned changing device with INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:01 ` [PATCH 06/11] btrfs-progs: handle split-brain scenario for scanned changed/unchanged " damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:02 ` [PATCH 07/11] btrfs-progs: handle split-brain scenario for scanned changed/unchanged device without INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:02 ` [PATCH 08/11] btrfs-progs: metadata_uuid: remove old logic to find fs_devices damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:02 ` [PATCH 09/11] btrfs-progs: metadata_uuid: rewrite fs_devices fsid and metadata_uuid if it's changing damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:02 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs-progs: metadata_uuid: clear FSID_CHANGING_V2 while open_ctree() damenly.su
2019-12-12 11:02 ` [PATCH 11/11] btrfs-progs: misc-tests/034: add new test images and modify the script damenly.su
2020-01-31 8:00 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-31 8:05 ` [PATCH 00/11] btrfs-progs: metadata_uuid feature fixes and portation Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-31 10:04 ` Su Yue
2020-03-04 14:14 ` David Sterba
2020-03-05 1:18 ` Su Yue
2020-03-05 14:16 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191212110204.11128-5-Damenly_Su@gmx.com \
--to=damenly.su@gmail.com \
--cc=Damenly_Su@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox