From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44632C2D0DC for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B93206E6 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728819AbgABQk4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:40:56 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56722 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728280AbgABQk4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:40:56 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F821AD3B; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 33FD5DA790; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:40:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:40:46 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Qu Wenruo Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: ctree.h: Sync the comment for btrfs_file_extent_item Message-ID: <20200102164046.GK3929@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <20191217065240.5919-1-wqu@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191217065240.5919-1-wqu@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 02:52:40PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > The comment about data checksum on disk_bytes is completely wrong. > > Sync it with fixed kernel comment to avoid confusion. > > Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Applied, thanks.