From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D1CC33C8C for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 16:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3390B222D9 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 16:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726561AbgAFQaN (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:30:13 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51022 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726448AbgAFQaN (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:30:13 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC73ABE9; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 16:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id CE0C5DA78B; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 17:30:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 17:30:01 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Dennis Zhou Cc: David Sterba , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , Omar Sandoval , kernel-team@fb.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] btrfs: async discard follow up Message-ID: <20200106163001.GM3929@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Dennis Zhou , David Sterba , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , Omar Sandoval , kernel-team@fb.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Is it expected to leave the counters in a state where are discardable extents but not process after a long period of time? I found discard_bitmap_bytes:316833792 discard_bytes_saved:59390722048 discard_extent_bytes:26122764288 discardable_bytes:44863488 discardable_extents:883 iops_limit:10 kbps_limit:0 max_discard_size:67108864 there was activity when the number of extents wen from about 2000 to that value (833), so this could bea nother instance of the -1 accounting bug.