From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09F0C2D0DB for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9056720716 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726694AbgA2Npm (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:45:42 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34874 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726145AbgA2Npl (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:45:41 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D95AD3A; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 38EA2DA730; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:45:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:45:21 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Qu Wenruo Cc: Josef Bacik , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, David Sterba Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][v2] clean up how we mark block groups read only Message-ID: <20200129134520.GD3929@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo , Josef Bacik , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com References: <20200117140739.42560-1-josef@toxicpanda.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 02:05:33PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Hi David, > > This is also an important patchset, mostly to solve the false ENOSPC > from btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() calls. > One obvious example is btrfs/182 test case. > > Would you mind to merge it for misc-next? No, I don't mind and various other patchsets are next first to be merged once merge window ends.