public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: btrfs/153: Remove it from auto group
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 15:36:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200201073649.GA2697@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114125044.21594-1-wqu@suse.com>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 08:50:44PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> This test case always fail after commit c6887cd11149 ("Btrfs: don't do
> nocow check unless we have to").
> As btrfs no longer checks nodatacow at buffered write time.
> 
> That commits brings in a big performance enhancement, as that check is
> not cheap, but breaks qgroup, as write into preallocated space now needs
> extra space.
> 
> There isn't yet a good solution (reverting that patch is not possible,
> and only check nodatacow for quota enabled case is very bug prune due to
> quite a lot code change).
> 
> We may solve it using the new ticketed space reservation facility, but
> that won't come into fruit anytime soon.
> 
> So let's just remove that test case from 'auto' group, but still keep
> the test case to inform we still have a lot of work to do.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

I'd like to see an ACK from btrfs folks. Thanks!

Eryu

> ---
>  tests/btrfs/group | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
> index 697b6a38ea00..3c554a194742 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
>  150 auto quick dangerous
>  151 auto quick volume
>  152 auto quick metadata qgroup send
> -153 auto quick qgroup limit
> +153 quick qgroup limit
>  154 auto quick volume
>  155 auto quick send
>  156 auto quick trim
> -- 
> 2.24.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-01  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-14 12:50 [PATCH] fstests: btrfs/153: Remove it from auto group Qu Wenruo
2020-02-01  7:36 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2020-02-01 11:10   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-02-01 12:38     ` Qu Wenruo
2020-02-01 13:07       ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200201073649.GA2697@desktop \
    --to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox