From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: fix bytes_may_use underflow in prealloc error condtition
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:47:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200213154731.90994-5-josef@toxicpanda.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200213154731.90994-1-josef@toxicpanda.com>
I hit the following warning while running my error injection stress testing
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1453 at fs/btrfs/space-info.h:108 btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota+0xfd/0x160 [btrfs]
RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota+0xfd/0x160 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space+0x4f/0x70 [btrfs]
__btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x378/0x470 [btrfs]
elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
? elfcorehdr_read+0x40/0x40
? btrfs_commit_transaction+0xca/0xa50 [btrfs]
? dput+0xb4/0x2a0
? btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x55/0x70 [btrfs]
? btrfs_sync_file+0x30e/0x420 [btrfs]
? do_fsync+0x38/0x70
? __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x13/0x20
? do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1b0
? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
---[ end trace 70ccb5d0fe51151c ]---
This happens if we fail to insert our reserved file extent. At this
point we've already converted our reservation from ->bytes_may_use to
->bytes_reserved. However once we break we will attempt to free
everything from [cur_offset, end] from ->bytes_may_use, but our extent
reservation will overlap part of this.
Fix this problem by adding ins.offset (our extent allocation size) to
cur_offset so we remove the actual remaining part from ->bytes_may_use.
I validated this fix using my inject-error.py script
python inject-error.py -o should_fail_bio -t cache_save_setup -t \
__btrfs_prealloc_file_range \
-t insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.0 \
-r "-5" ./run-fsstress.sh
where run-fsstress.sh simply mounts and runs fsstress on a disk.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 84e649724549..ffc6fcfe805c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -9876,6 +9876,7 @@ static int __btrfs_prealloc_file_range(struct inode *inode, int mode,
struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
struct btrfs_key ins;
u64 cur_offset = start;
+ u64 clear_offset = start;
u64 i_size;
u64 cur_bytes;
u64 last_alloc = (u64)-1;
@@ -9910,6 +9911,15 @@ static int __btrfs_prealloc_file_range(struct inode *inode, int mode,
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
break;
}
+
+ /*
+ * We've reserved this space, and thus converted it from
+ * ->bytes_may_use to ->bytes_reserved. Any error that happens
+ * from here on out we will only need to clear our reservation
+ * for the remaining unreserved area, so advance our
+ * clear_offset by our extent size.
+ */
+ clear_offset += ins.offset;
btrfs_dec_block_group_reservations(fs_info, ins.objectid);
last_alloc = ins.offset;
@@ -9989,9 +9999,9 @@ static int __btrfs_prealloc_file_range(struct inode *inode, int mode,
if (own_trans)
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
}
- if (cur_offset < end)
- btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(inode, NULL, cur_offset,
- end - cur_offset + 1);
+ if (clear_offset < end)
+ btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(inode, NULL, clear_offset,
+ end - clear_offset + 1);
return ret;
}
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-13 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-13 15:47 [PATCH 0/4][v2] Error condition failure fixes Josef Bacik
2020-02-13 15:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: set fs_root = NULL on error Josef Bacik
2020-02-13 15:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] btrfs: do not check delayed items are empty for single trans cleanup Josef Bacik
2020-02-13 15:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: handle logged extent failure properly Josef Bacik
2020-02-13 15:47 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2020-02-18 15:00 ` [PATCH 0/4][v2] Error condition failure fixes David Sterba
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-11 21:40 [PATCH 0/4] " Josef Bacik
2020-02-11 21:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: fix bytes_may_use underflow in prealloc error condtition Josef Bacik
2020-02-12 1:00 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-02-13 10:17 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-02-13 15:29 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200213154731.90994-5-josef@toxicpanda.com \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox