From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] btrfs: backref: Introduce the skeleton of btrfs_backref_iter
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:01:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200218090129.134450-2-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200218090129.134450-1-wqu@suse.com>
Due to the complex nature of btrfs extent tree, when we want to iterate
all backrefs of one extent, it involves quite a lot of work, like
searching the EXTENT_ITEM/METADATA_ITEM, iteration through inline and keyed
backrefs.
Normally this would result pretty complex code, something like:
btrfs_search_slot()
/* Ensure we are at EXTENT_ITEM/METADATA_ITEM */
while (1) { /* Loop for extent tree items */
while (ptr < end) { /* Loop for inlined items */
/* REAL WORK HERE */
}
next:
ret = btrfs_next_item()
/* Ensure we're still at keyed item for specified bytenr */
}
The idea of btrfs_backref_iter is to avoid such complex and hard to
read code structure, but something like the following:
iter = btrfs_backref_iter_alloc();
ret = btrfs_backref_iter_start(iter, bytenr);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
for (; ; ret = btrfs_backref_iter_next(iter)) {
/* REAL WORK HERE */
}
out:
btrfs_backref_iter_free(iter);
This patch is just the skeleton + btrfs_backref_iter_start() code.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/btrfs/backref.h | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 147 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index e5d85311d5d5..c78d15bb999d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -2252,3 +2252,90 @@ void free_ipath(struct inode_fs_paths *ipath)
kvfree(ipath->fspath);
kfree(ipath);
}
+
+int btrfs_backref_iter_start(struct btrfs_backref_iter *iter, u64 bytenr)
+{
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = iter->fs_info;
+ struct btrfs_path *path = iter->path;
+ struct btrfs_extent_item *ei;
+ struct btrfs_key key;
+ int ret;
+
+ key.objectid = bytenr;
+ key.type = BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY;
+ key.offset = (u64)-1;
+ iter->bytenr = bytenr;
+
+ ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, fs_info->extent_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ if (ret == 0) {
+ ret = -EUCLEAN;
+ goto release;
+ }
+ if (path->slots[0] == 0) {
+ WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG));
+ ret = -EUCLEAN;
+ goto release;
+ }
+ path->slots[0]--;
+
+ btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &key, path->slots[0]);
+ if (!(key.type == BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY ||
+ key.type == BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY) || key.objectid != bytenr) {
+ ret = -ENOENT;
+ goto release;
+ }
+ memcpy(&iter->cur_key, &key, sizeof(key));
+ iter->item_ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(path->nodes[0],
+ path->slots[0]);
+ iter->end_ptr = iter->item_ptr + btrfs_item_size_nr(path->nodes[0],
+ path->slots[0]);
+ ei = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
+ struct btrfs_extent_item);
+
+ /*
+ * Only support iteration on tree backref yet.
+ *
+ * This is extra precaustion for non skinny-metadata, where
+ * EXTENT_ITEM is also used for tree blocks, that we can only use
+ * extent flags to determine if it's a tree block.
+ */
+ if (btrfs_extent_flags(path->nodes[0], ei) & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_DATA) {
+ ret = -ENOTTY;
+ goto release;
+ }
+ iter->cur_ptr = iter->item_ptr + sizeof(*ei);
+
+ /* If there is no inline backref, go search for keyed backref */
+ if (iter->cur_ptr >= iter->end_ptr) {
+ ret = btrfs_next_item(fs_info->extent_root, path);
+
+ /* No inline nor keyed ref */
+ if (ret > 0) {
+ ret = -ENOENT;
+ goto release;
+ }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto release;
+
+ btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &iter->cur_key,
+ path->slots[0]);
+ if (iter->cur_key.objectid != bytenr ||
+ (iter->cur_key.type != BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY &&
+ iter->cur_key.type != BTRFS_TREE_BLOCK_REF_KEY)) {
+ ret = -ENOENT;
+ goto release;
+ }
+ iter->cur_ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(path->nodes[0],
+ path->slots[0]);
+ iter->item_ptr = iter->cur_ptr;
+ iter->end_ptr = iter->item_ptr + btrfs_item_size_nr(
+ path->nodes[0], path->slots[0]);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+release:
+ btrfs_backref_iter_release(iter);
+ return ret;
+}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.h b/fs/btrfs/backref.h
index 777f61dc081e..8b1ec11d4b28 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.h
@@ -74,4 +74,64 @@ struct prelim_ref {
u64 wanted_disk_byte;
};
+/*
+ * Helper structure to help iterate backrefs of one extent.
+ *
+ * Now it only supports iteration for tree block in commit root.
+ */
+struct btrfs_backref_iter {
+ u64 bytenr;
+ struct btrfs_path *path;
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
+ struct btrfs_key cur_key;
+ unsigned long item_ptr;
+ unsigned long cur_ptr;
+ unsigned long end_ptr;
+};
+
+static inline struct btrfs_backref_iter *
+btrfs_backref_iter_alloc(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, gfp_t gfp_flag)
+{
+ struct btrfs_backref_iter *ret;
+
+ ret = kzalloc(sizeof(*ret), gfp_flag);
+ if (!ret)
+ return NULL;
+
+ ret->path = btrfs_alloc_path();
+ if (!ret) {
+ kfree(ret);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ /* Current backref iterator only supports iteration in commit root */
+ ret->path->search_commit_root = 1;
+ ret->path->skip_locking = 1;
+ ret->path->reada = READA_FORWARD;
+ ret->fs_info = fs_info;
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline void btrfs_backref_iter_free(struct btrfs_backref_iter *iter)
+{
+ if (!iter)
+ return;
+ btrfs_free_path(iter->path);
+ kfree(iter);
+}
+
+int btrfs_backref_iter_start(struct btrfs_backref_iter *iter, u64 bytenr);
+
+static inline void
+btrfs_backref_iter_release(struct btrfs_backref_iter *iter)
+{
+ iter->bytenr = 0;
+ iter->item_ptr = 0;
+ iter->cur_ptr = 0;
+ iter->end_ptr = 0;
+ btrfs_release_path(iter->path);
+ memset(&iter->cur_key, 0, sizeof(iter->cur_key));
+}
+
#endif
--
2.25.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-18 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-18 9:01 [PATCH v5 0/3] Btrfs: relocation: Refactor build_backref_tree() using btrfs_backref_iterator infrastructure Qu Wenruo
2020-02-18 9:01 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2020-02-19 8:58 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] btrfs: backref: Introduce the skeleton of btrfs_backref_iter Nikolay Borisov
2020-02-20 15:07 ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-18 9:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] btrfs: backref: Implement btrfs_backref_iter_next() Qu Wenruo
2020-02-19 9:01 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-02-20 15:08 ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-18 9:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] btrfs: relocation: Use btrfs_backref_iter infrastructure Qu Wenruo
2020-02-20 15:09 ` Josef Bacik
2020-02-19 9:01 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Btrfs: relocation: Refactor build_backref_tree() using btrfs_backref_iterator infrastructure Nikolay Borisov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200218090129.134450-2-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).