From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: raid56: simplify tracking of Q stripe presence
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:17:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200219141720.21549-1-dsterba@suse.com> (raw)
There are temporary variables tracking the index of P and Q stripes, but
none of them is really used as such, merely for determining if the Q
stripe is present. This leads to compiler warnings with
-Wunused-but-set-variable and has been reported several times.
fs/btrfs/raid56.c: In function ‘finish_rmw’:
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:1199:6: warning: variable ‘p_stripe’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
1199 | int p_stripe = -1;
| ^~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/raid56.c: In function ‘finish_parity_scrub’:
fs/btrfs/raid56.c:2356:6: warning: variable ‘p_stripe’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
2356 | int p_stripe = -1;
| ^~~~~~~~
Replace the two variables with one that has a clear meaning and also get
rid of the warnings. The logic that verifies that there are only 2
valid cases is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 37 +++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
index a8e53c8e7b01..406b1efd3ba5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
@@ -1196,22 +1196,19 @@ static noinline void finish_rmw(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
int nr_data = rbio->nr_data;
int stripe;
int pagenr;
- int p_stripe = -1;
- int q_stripe = -1;
+ bool has_qstripe;
struct bio_list bio_list;
struct bio *bio;
int ret;
bio_list_init(&bio_list);
- if (rbio->real_stripes - rbio->nr_data == 1) {
- p_stripe = rbio->real_stripes - 1;
- } else if (rbio->real_stripes - rbio->nr_data == 2) {
- p_stripe = rbio->real_stripes - 2;
- q_stripe = rbio->real_stripes - 1;
- } else {
+ if (rbio->real_stripes - rbio->nr_data == 1)
+ has_qstripe = false;
+ else if (rbio->real_stripes - rbio->nr_data == 2)
+ has_qstripe = true;
+ else
BUG();
- }
/* at this point we either have a full stripe,
* or we've read the full stripe from the drive.
@@ -1255,7 +1252,7 @@ static noinline void finish_rmw(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
SetPageUptodate(p);
pointers[stripe++] = kmap(p);
- if (q_stripe != -1) {
+ if (has_qstripe) {
/*
* raid6, add the qstripe and call the
@@ -2353,8 +2350,7 @@ static noinline void finish_parity_scrub(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,
int nr_data = rbio->nr_data;
int stripe;
int pagenr;
- int p_stripe = -1;
- int q_stripe = -1;
+ bool has_qstripe;
struct page *p_page = NULL;
struct page *q_page = NULL;
struct bio_list bio_list;
@@ -2364,14 +2360,12 @@ static noinline void finish_parity_scrub(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,
bio_list_init(&bio_list);
- if (rbio->real_stripes - rbio->nr_data == 1) {
- p_stripe = rbio->real_stripes - 1;
- } else if (rbio->real_stripes - rbio->nr_data == 2) {
- p_stripe = rbio->real_stripes - 2;
- q_stripe = rbio->real_stripes - 1;
- } else {
+ if (rbio->real_stripes - rbio->nr_data == 1)
+ has_qstripe = false;
+ else if (rbio->real_stripes - rbio->nr_data == 2)
+ has_qstripe = true;
+ else
BUG();
- }
if (bbio->num_tgtdevs && bbio->tgtdev_map[rbio->scrubp]) {
is_replace = 1;
@@ -2393,7 +2387,7 @@ static noinline void finish_parity_scrub(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,
goto cleanup;
SetPageUptodate(p_page);
- if (q_stripe != -1) {
+ if (has_qstripe) {
q_page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
if (!q_page) {
__free_page(p_page);
@@ -2416,8 +2410,7 @@ static noinline void finish_parity_scrub(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio,
/* then add the parity stripe */
pointers[stripe++] = kmap(p_page);
- if (q_stripe != -1) {
-
+ if (has_qstripe) {
/*
* raid6, add the qstripe and call the
* library function to fill in our p/q
--
2.25.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-19 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-19 14:17 David Sterba [this message]
2020-02-19 16:23 ` [PATCH] btrfs: raid56: simplify tracking of Q stripe presence Johannes Thumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200219141720.21549-1-dsterba@suse.com \
--to=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox