Re: [PATCH 00/10] btrfs: relocation: Refactor build_backref_tree()

Qu Wenruo
2020-02-29T01:00:55Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1409 bytes --]

On 2020/2/28 下午11:45, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 01:56:42PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> This branch can be fetched from github:
>> https://github.com/adam900710/linux/tree/backref_cache_new
>
> This is based on v5.6-rc1, you should base on something more recent.
> There are many non-trivial conflicts at patch 5 so I stopped there but
> if you and I like to get the pathes merged, the branch needs to be in a
> state where it's not that hard to apply the patches.

Because it looks like current misc-next is not a good place to do proper
testing, and it's undergoing frequent updates.

Thus I choose the latest rc when I started the development.

Currently the branch is only for review and my local testing, I just
want to make sure that everything works fine before rebasing them to
misc-next.

Anyway, next time I'll mention the basis, and explicitly shows that I'll
do the rebase (and retest) if you want to try merge.

Thanks,
Qu

>
> Minor conflicts are expected, like obvious differences in context or
> renames, there are tools that can deal with that automatically (I use
> wiggle).
>
> The branch also contains unrelated patches to the backref code, some of
> them either upstream or in misc-next. All of that makes it unnecessarily
> hard to get the patches to for-next when the time comes (reviews, patch
> backlog processed).
>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]