From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CAD5C3F2D2 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D002469F for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727018AbgB1PqS (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:46:18 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46182 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726796AbgB1PqS (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:46:18 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3E9AD9A; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 21287DA79B; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:45:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:45:55 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Qu Wenruo Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] btrfs: relocation: Refactor build_backref_tree() Message-ID: <20200228154555.GN2902@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <20200226055652.24857-1-wqu@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200226055652.24857-1-wqu@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 01:56:42PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > This branch can be fetched from github: > https://github.com/adam900710/linux/tree/backref_cache_new This is based on v5.6-rc1, you should base on something more recent. There are many non-trivial conflicts at patch 5 so I stopped there but if you and I like to get the pathes merged, the branch needs to be in a state where it's not that hard to apply the patches. Minor conflicts are expected, like obvious differences in context or renames, there are tools that can deal with that automatically (I use wiggle). The branch also contains unrelated patches to the backref code, some of them either upstream or in misc-next. All of that makes it unnecessarily hard to get the patches to for-next when the time comes (reviews, patch backlog processed).