public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Output proper csum string if csum mismatch
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:28:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200304142802.GU2902@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200120093205.37824-1-wqu@suse.com>

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:32:05PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Introduce a new helper, csum_to_string(), to convert binary csum to
> string.
> 
> And use it in check_extent_csums(), so that
> "btrfs check --check-data-csum" could report the following human
> readable output:
>   mirror 1 bytenr 13631488 csum 0x13fec125 expected csum 0x98757625
> 
> Other than the original octane one:
>   mirror 1 bytenr 13631488 csum 19 expected csum 152
> 
> It also has the extra handling for 32 bytes csum (e.g. SHA256).
> For such long csum, it needs 66 characters (+2 for "0x") to just output
> one hash, so this function would truncate them into the following
> format:
>  0xaabb...ccdd
>     |       \- The tailing 2 bytes
>     \--------- The leading 2 bytes

Kernel prints the whole checksum and also 2 on one line,
btrfs_print_data_csum_error. The short version is ok for quick comparing
but for consistency do you think it's too bad to print the whole
checksum? Eg. when I see errors, copy&paste the checksum and can cross
check with the kernel messages/logs.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-04 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-20  9:32 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Output proper csum string if csum mismatch Qu Wenruo
2020-03-04 14:28 ` David Sterba [this message]
2020-03-05  0:46   ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200304142802.GU2902@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox