From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0C9C43331 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB24820757 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 04:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726194AbgCaEUv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 00:20:51 -0400 Received: from james.kirk.hungrycats.org ([174.142.39.145]:38522 "EHLO james.kirk.hungrycats.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725809AbgCaEUv (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 00:20:51 -0400 Received: by james.kirk.hungrycats.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 97C00642C4B; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 00:20:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 00:20:50 -0400 From: Zygo Blaxell To: Brad Templeton <4brad@templetons.com> Cc: Andrei Borzenkov , Tomasz Chmielewski , Btrfs BTRFS Subject: Re: btrfs-transacti hangs system for several seconds every few minutes Message-ID: <20200331042050.GE13306@hungrycats.org> References: <94d08f2b57dd2df746436a0d6bb5f51e@wpkg.org> <8703e779-d31b-37c1-672b-dea482e8a491@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:11:41AM -0700, Brad Templeton wrote: > Also, isn't it 4 debs -- image, modules, headers and architecture > independent headers? > > Still, I am surprised that the ubuntu team, with a data corruption > issue, would not make a priority to install a fixed kernel or at least > backport btrfs modules into the current kernel. It probably hasn't been reported to them. Distro vendors are kind of on their own for long-term kernel bug fixes, especially for non-LTS kernels like 5.3. kernel.org support ended last year, just before the bug was identified. > On 3/29/20 10:56 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > 30.03.2020 05:29, Tomasz Chmielewski пишет: > >>> I wonder why they put 5.3.0 as the standard advanced Kernel in Ubuntu > >>> LTS if it has a data corruption bug.   I don't know if I've seen any > >>> release of 5.4.14 in a PPA yet -- manual kernel install is such a pain > >>> the few times I have done it. > >> > >> You have all kernels compiled as packages here (for Ubuntu): > >> > >> https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/ > >> > >> So just download two deb packages, dpkg -i, and done. > >> > > > > Beware that it is not exactly the same as distribution kernel (both in > > terms of included patches and enabled configuration options). Also > > matching linux-tools is not provided which means perf, cpupower, > > turbostat and some other tools stop working. > >