From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FDAC2BB1D for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 10:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50CC20644 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 10:39:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586255941; bh=aAeqOZ2i4NH1NOh+evabn+pf6BwZ5V7SBjrEnHuFZk0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:List-ID:From; b=H+sEh5x06T0SMywp/JZqM6xV5/HU0r3JZUaS/pZjNC08IGCu5J4I97SXK0KQH1/QM 4g4HlPcMSIucFOYPDf1GRd9pqnxMj1D5Gb6A2GUSZp9E21FINhjCvjia36+m1gC8Nz BzmuJ15tpNmCgvXbHzgTE1ItBJcy/w5Etz5pCqZU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728294AbgDGKjB (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 06:39:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44500 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725883AbgDGKjA (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 06:39:00 -0400 Received: from debian6.Home (bl8-197-74.dsl.telepac.pt [85.241.197.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BED120644 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 10:38:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586255940; bh=aAeqOZ2i4NH1NOh+evabn+pf6BwZ5V7SBjrEnHuFZk0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=j27vFAdkHiWwBHmstsJpQBePebjB9/Wp+Xshp5zpkxHW+nZupckwhkUCO4HFRRx9Y XlWu3OHDygvxDd6V5hRNmkC+XKRaFviGaqdbJjel/PLskEz0jdCQ5TQjb9MHHMtR0W tm7nKXVTsIdaD/l7F/EZMUkB24121Q8fso65OLAA= From: fdmanana@kernel.org To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: remove pointless assertion on reclaim_size counter Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 11:38:58 +0100 Message-Id: <20200407103858.31029-1-fdmanana@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Filipe Manana The reclaim_size counter of a space_info object is unsigned. So its value can never be negative, it's pointless to have an assertion that checks its value is >= 0, therefore remove it. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana --- fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c index ff17a4420358..88d7dea215ff 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c @@ -1198,7 +1198,6 @@ static int __reserve_metadata_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, * the list and we will do our own flushing further down. */ if (ret && flush != BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSH) { - ASSERT(space_info->reclaim_size >= 0); ticket.bytes = orig_bytes; ticket.error = 0; space_info->reclaim_size += ticket.bytes; -- 2.11.0