Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
To: Michael Thomas <mt@bxx5.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any news about rescue data from a raid5 in the last years?
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 00:47:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527044737.GF10769@hungrycats.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41c53dd1-b553-bc2e-115d-b227f97c43c2@merkens.info>

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 04:44:25AM +0200, Michael Thomas wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> I just wanted to ask if it's maybe possible to restore data from an old,
> failed, raid5 btrfs fs. There are some files on it which I lost lately and
> before I format the drives I wanted to give it another shot after some (6?)
> years.
> I'm not sure what I tried before, but there are 3 drives there, was 4 before
> but 1 died (and this seems to be the problem of the disaster).
> I tried to add 1 new, but that didn't worked.
> So, there are 3 devices and as far as I understand, there are still no good
> tools to rescue data from them, are they? btrfs restore and other seems only
> compatible with 1 drive.
> 
> But maybe someone can give me a hint what I can try before giving up.
> 
> If I try to mount:
> mount -o degraded,subvol=data,ro,device=/dev/mapper/sdb,device=/dev/mapper/sdd,device=/dev/mapper/sde
> /dev/mapper/sde /mnt/test
> 
> dmesg give this errors:
> BTRFS warning (device dm-4): suspicious: generation < chunk_root_generation:
> 176279 < 176413
> BTRFS info (device dm-4): allowing degraded mounts
> BTRFS info (device dm-4): disk space caching is enabled
> BTRFS warning (device dm-4): devid 4 uuid
> 16490fb1-df5e-4c81-9c07-4f799d0fc132 is missing
> BTRFS warning (device dm-4): devid 5 uuid
> 36436209-c0d4-4a5e-9176-d44c94cb4b39 is missing

That's 2 missing disks.  Assuming that is accurate (were there 5 in
total?), it is not likely recoverable with raid5.

raid5 tolerates only one disk failure--two or more failures, and you'll
only be able to get 64K contiguous chunks of data without any idea
what files they belong to.

If the messages are _not_ accurate, you might have a corrupted superblock
on one of the disks that is making 'btrfs dev scan' fail.  If you can
identify which disk that is, 'btrfs rescue super-recover' might help
(though it sounds like you already tried and it didn't).

> BTRFS critical (device dm-4): corrupt leaf: block=1095416938496 slot=151
> extent bytenr=1095389085696 len=16384 invalid generation, have 176581 expect
> (0, 176280]
> BTRFS error (device dm-4): block=1095416938496 read time tree block
> corruption detected

You may have more luck with kernel 4.19, which is a LTS kernel without
the read time tree block corruption detector; however, that won't be able
to read past the corrupted tree block, it will only let you mount the
filesystem to try to salvage other data.

> BTRFS critical (device dm-4): corrupt leaf: block=1095416938496 slot=151
> extent bytenr=1095389085696 len=16384 invalid generation, have 176581 expect
> (0, 176280]
> BTRFS error (device dm-4): block=1095416938496 read time tree block
> corruption detected
> BTRFS warning (device dm-4): failed to read root (objectid=4): -5
> BTRFS error (device dm-4): open_ctree failed
> 
> (usebackuproot changed nothing and super-recover prints "All supers are
> valid, no need to recover")
> 
> Do you have any hint, advice to get (some of) this data back?
> 
> 
> Best,
> Michael

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-27  4:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-26  2:44 Any news about rescue data from a raid5 in the last years? Michael Thomas
2020-05-27  4:47 ` Zygo Blaxell [this message]
2020-05-27  5:27   ` Michael Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200527044737.GF10769@hungrycats.org \
    --to=ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mt@bxx5.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox