From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: Simplify setup_nodes_for_search
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 13:11:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527101109.7492-1-nborisov@suse.com> (raw)
The function is needlessly convoluted. Fix that by:
* Removing redundant sret variable definition in both if arms
* Replace the again/done labels with direct return statements, the
function is short enough and doesn't do anything special upon exit.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 33 ++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 72a3389d2d87..bd1d54e6b4cc 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -2436,55 +2436,46 @@ setup_nodes_for_search(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if ((p->search_for_split || ins_len > 0) && btrfs_header_nritems(b) >=
BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(fs_info) - 3) {
- int sret;
if (*write_lock_level < level + 1) {
*write_lock_level = level + 1;
btrfs_release_path(p);
- goto again;
+ return -EAGAIN;
}
btrfs_set_path_blocking(p);
reada_for_balance(fs_info, p, level);
- sret = split_node(trans, root, p, level);
+ ret = split_node(trans, root, p, level);
+
+ BUG_ON(ret > 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
- BUG_ON(sret > 0);
- if (sret) {
- ret = sret;
- goto done;
- }
b = p->nodes[level];
} else if (ins_len < 0 && btrfs_header_nritems(b) <
BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(fs_info) / 2) {
- int sret;
if (*write_lock_level < level + 1) {
*write_lock_level = level + 1;
btrfs_release_path(p);
- goto again;
+ return -EAGAIN;
}
btrfs_set_path_blocking(p);
reada_for_balance(fs_info, p, level);
- sret = balance_level(trans, root, p, level);
+ ret = balance_level(trans, root, p, level);
+
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
- if (sret) {
- ret = sret;
- goto done;
- }
b = p->nodes[level];
if (!b) {
btrfs_release_path(p);
- goto again;
+ return -EAGAIN;
}
BUG_ON(btrfs_header_nritems(b) == 1);
}
return 0;
-
-again:
- ret = -EAGAIN;
-done:
- return ret;
}
int btrfs_find_item(struct btrfs_root *fs_root, struct btrfs_path *path,
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-05-27 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 10:11 Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2020-05-27 12:56 ` [PATCH] btrfs: Simplify setup_nodes_for_search Johannes Thumshirn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-11-12 11:16 Nikolay Borisov
2020-11-12 12:17 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-13 3:30 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-13 5:06 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200527101109.7492-1-nborisov@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).