From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: fix btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space() return
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:10:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200603101020.143372-2-anand.jain@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200603101020.143372-1-anand.jain@oracle.com>
__btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space() returns only 0. And all its parent
functions don't need the return value either so make this a void function.
Further, as none of the callers of btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space() is
actually using the return from this function, make this function also
return void.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 13 +++++--------
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
index 55955bd424d7..1bf08c855edb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
@@ -2703,7 +2703,7 @@ void btrfs_init_free_space_ctl(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group)
* pointed to by the cluster, someone else raced in and freed the
* cluster already. In that case, we just return without changing anything
*/
-static int
+static void
__btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
struct btrfs_free_cluster *cluster)
@@ -2756,7 +2756,6 @@ __btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(
out:
spin_unlock(&cluster->lock);
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
- return 0;
}
static void __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache_locked(
@@ -2907,12 +2906,11 @@ u64 btrfs_find_space_for_alloc(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
* Otherwise, it'll get a reference on the block group pointed to by the
* cluster and remove the cluster from it.
*/
-int btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(
+void btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
struct btrfs_free_cluster *cluster)
{
struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl;
- int ret;
/* first, get a safe pointer to the block group */
spin_lock(&cluster->lock);
@@ -2920,12 +2918,12 @@ int btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(
block_group = cluster->block_group;
if (!block_group) {
spin_unlock(&cluster->lock);
- return 0;
+ return;
}
} else if (cluster->block_group != block_group) {
/* someone else has already freed it don't redo their work */
spin_unlock(&cluster->lock);
- return 0;
+ return;
}
atomic_inc(&block_group->count);
spin_unlock(&cluster->lock);
@@ -2934,14 +2932,13 @@ int btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(
/* now return any extents the cluster had on it */
spin_lock(&ctl->tree_lock);
- ret = __btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(block_group, cluster);
+ __btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(block_group, cluster);
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
btrfs_discard_queue_work(&block_group->fs_info->discard_ctl, block_group);
/* finally drop our ref */
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
- return ret;
}
static u64 btrfs_alloc_from_bitmap(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h
index 2e0a8077aa74..e3d5e0ad8f8e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ void btrfs_init_free_cluster(struct btrfs_free_cluster *cluster);
u64 btrfs_alloc_from_cluster(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
struct btrfs_free_cluster *cluster, u64 bytes,
u64 min_start, u64 *max_extent_size);
-int btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(
+void btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
struct btrfs_free_cluster *cluster);
int btrfs_trim_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-03 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 10:10 [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: minor block group cleanups Anand Jain
2020-06-03 10:10 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2020-06-03 10:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: fix btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space() return Nikolay Borisov
2020-06-03 10:33 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-06-03 10:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group::count Anand Jain
2020-06-03 10:19 ` Filipe Manana
2020-06-03 10:43 ` Anand Jain
2020-06-03 10:49 ` Filipe Manana
2020-06-03 11:38 ` Anand Jain
2020-06-03 11:54 ` Filipe Manana
2020-06-03 10:23 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-06-03 10:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: use helper btrfs_get_block_group Anand Jain
2020-06-03 10:24 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-06-03 10:34 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-06-04 16:56 ` [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: minor block group cleanups David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200603101020.143372-2-anand.jain@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox