From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC339C433DF for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 23:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D316D20760 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 23:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726032AbgGBXqw (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 19:46:52 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55610 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725937AbgGBXqv (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 19:46:51 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A115ABF4; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 23:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 5CE45DAD42; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 01:46:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 01:46:32 +0200 From: David Sterba To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo , Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Greed Rong Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: preallocate anon_dev for subvolume and snapshot creation Message-ID: <20200702234632.GU27795@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo , Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Greed Rong References: <20200616021737.44617-1-wqu@suse.com> <20200616021737.44617-4-wqu@suse.com> <20200616151004.GE27795@twin.jikos.cz> <20200701173928.GF27795@twin.jikos.cz> <0cfc15be-3a4a-c6d2-b294-eeb0a4506df4@gmx.com> <20200702160821.GT27795@twin.jikos.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200702160821.GT27795@twin.jikos.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:08:21PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 07:56:57AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > On 2020/7/2 上午1:39, David Sterba wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 11:25:27AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > Adding the anon_dev argument to btrfs_get_fs_root is wrong and I have > > > never suggested that. What I meant is to put the actual id allocation > > > to the callers where the subvolume is created, ie only 2 places. > > > > You mean to extract btrfs_init_fs_root() out of btrfs_get_fs_root()? > > > > That looks a little risky and I can't find any good solution to make it > > more elegant than the current one. > > I spent more time reading through the get-fs-root functions and the main > problem is that btrfs_get_fs_root is doing several things, and it makes > a lot of code simple, I certainly want to keep it that way. > > The idea was to pre-insert the new root (similar to the root item > insertion, btrfs_insert_root) and not letting btrfs_get_fs_root call to > btrfs_init_fs_info where the anon_bdev allocation happens for all the > other non-ioctl cases. > > Which could be done by factoring out btrfs_init_fs_root from > btrfs_get_fs_root. This would allow to extend only btrfs_init_fs_root > arguments with the anon_bdev, and keep btrfs_get_fs_root intact. > So this is splitting the API from the end. > > What you originally proposed is a split from the begnning, ie. add a > common implementation for existing and new and provide btrfs_get_fs_root > and btrfs_get_new_fs_root that would hide the additional parameters. > > Both ways are IMO valid but I thought it would be easier to pass the > anon bdev inside ioctl callbacks. The problem that makes my proposal > less appealing is that btrfs_read_tree_root gets called earlier than > I'd like so factoring everything after btrfs_init_fs_root would not be > so straightforward. > > In conclusion, your proposal is better and I'm going to merge it. > > > Although I would definitely remove the "__" prefix as we shouldn't add > > such prefix anymore. > > Yeah with the small naming fixups. It's in for-next-20200703. I've updated the changelogs to reflect what we found during debugging the issue, the __ function renamed to btrfs_get_root_ref and some function comments added. All patches reordered and tagged for stable though the preallocation is not within the size limit.