From: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH v3] btrfs: fix mount failure caused by race with umount
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:29:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200716202946.2527706-1-boris@bur.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200716185110.GB3703@twin.jikos.cz>
It is possible to cause a btrfs mount to fail by racing it with a slow
umount. The crux of the sequence is generic_shutdown_super not yet
calling sop->put_super before btrfs_mount_root calls btrfs_open_devices.
If that occurs, btrfs_open_devices will decide the opened counter is
non-zero, increment it, and skip resetting fs_devices->total_rw_bytes to
0. From here, mount will call sget which will result in grab_super
trying to take the super block umount semaphore. That semaphore will be
held by the slow umount, so mount will block. Before up-ing the
semaphore, umount will delete the super block, resulting in mount's sget
reliably allocating a new one, which causes the mount path to dutifully
fill it out, and increment total_rw_bytes a second time, which causes
the mount to fail, as we see double the expected bytes.
Here is the sequence laid out in greater detail:
CPU0 CPU1
down_write sb->s_umount
btrfs_kill_super
kill_anon_super(sb)
generic_shutdown_super(sb);
shrink_dcache_for_umount(sb);
sync_filesystem(sb);
evict_inodes(sb); // SLOW
btrfs_mount_root
btrfs_scan_one_device
fs_devices = device->fs_devices
fs_info->fs_devices = fs_devices
// fs_devices-opened makes this a no-op
btrfs_open_devices(fs_devices, mode, fs_type)
s = sget(fs_type, test, set, flags, fs_info);
find sb in s_instances
grab_super(sb);
down_write(&s->s_umount); // blocks
sop->put_super(sb)
// sb->fs_devices->opened == 2; no-op
spin_lock(&sb_lock);
hlist_del_init(&sb->s_instances);
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
up_write(&sb->s_umount);
return 0;
retry lookup
don't find sb in s_instances (deleted by CPU0)
s = alloc_super
return s;
btrfs_fill_super(s, fs_devices, data)
open_ctree // fs_devices total_rw_bytes improperly set!
btrfs_read_chunk_tree
read_one_dev // increment total_rw_bytes again!!
super_total_bytes < fs_devices->total_rw_bytes // ERROR!!!
To fix this, we clear total_rw_bytes from within btrfs_read_chunk_tree
before the calls to read_one_dev, while holding the sb umount semaphore
and the uuid mutex.
To reproduce, it is sufficient to dirty a decent number of inodes, then
quickly umount and mount.
for i in $(seq 0 500)
do
dd if=/dev/zero of="/mnt/foo/$i" bs=1M count=1
done
umount /mnt/foo&
mount /mnt/foo
does the trick for me.
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index c7a3d4d730a3..26b9bcb00c2b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -7035,6 +7035,14 @@ int btrfs_read_chunk_tree(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+ /*
+ * It is possible for mount and umount to race in such a way that
+ * we execute this code path, but open_fs_devices failed to clear
+ * total_rw_bytes. We certainly want it cleared before reading the
+ * device items, so clear it here.
+ */
+ fs_info->fs_devices->total_rw_bytes = 0;
+
/*
* Read all device items, and then all the chunk items. All
* device items are found before any chunk item (their object id
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-16 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-10 0:44 [PATCH] btrfs: fix mount failure caused by race with umount Boris Burkov
2020-07-10 1:23 ` Josef Bacik
2020-07-10 17:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Boris Burkov
2020-07-10 17:51 ` Josef Bacik
2020-07-16 18:51 ` David Sterba
2020-07-16 20:29 ` Boris Burkov [this message]
2020-07-20 16:32 ` [PATCH v3] " David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200716202946.2527706-1-boris@bur.io \
--to=boris@bur.io \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox