From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6012C433E2 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8A92071A for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730382AbgGVOCs (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:02:48 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52864 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726425AbgGVOCs (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:02:48 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D680DAF38; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:02:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 91626DA70B; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:02:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:02:20 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Josef Bacik Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix a few lockdep splats Message-ID: <20200722140220.GV3703@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Josef Bacik , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com References: <20200717191229.2283043-1-josef@toxicpanda.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200717191229.2283043-1-josef@toxicpanda.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 03:12:26PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > We've had a longstanding lockdep splat in open_fs_devices that we've been > ignoring for some time, since it's not actually a problem. However this has > been masking all the other lockdep issues that we have, since lockdep takes its > ball and goes home as soon as you hit one problem. Added to misc-next, thanks. There should be like 4 lockdep fixes, let's see which tests with higher numbers were obscured due to the lockdep first-only behaviour.