From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: basic refactor of btrfs_buffered_write()
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:59:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200824075959.85212-1-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
This patchset will refactor btrfs_buffered_write() by:
- Extra the nrptrs calculation into one function
The main concern here is the batch number of pages.
Originally there is a max(nrptrs, 8), which looks so incorrect that my
eyes change it to min(nrptrs, 8) automatically.
This time we kill that max(nrptrr, 8), and replace it to a fixed size
up limit (64K), which should bring the same performance for different
page sized.
The limit can be changed if the 64K is not large enough for certain
buffered write.
- Refactor the main loop into process_one_batch()
No functional change, just plain refactor.
- Remove the again: tag by integrating page and extent locking
The new function lock_pages_and_extent() will handle the retry so we
don't need the tag any more in the main loop.
Changelog:
v2:
- Fix a bug that ENOSPC error is not returned to user space
It's caused by a missing assignment for (copied < 0) branch in the 2nd
patch.
Qu Wenruo (3):
btrfs: change how we calculate the nrptrs for btrfs_buffered_write()
btrfs: refactor btrfs_buffered_write() into process_one_batch()
btrfs: remove the again: tag in process_one_batch()
fs/btrfs/file.c | 570 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 303 insertions(+), 267 deletions(-)
--
2.28.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-08-24 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-24 7:59 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2020-08-24 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] btrfs: change how we calculate the nrptrs for btrfs_buffered_write() Qu Wenruo
2020-08-24 10:32 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-24 16:59 ` Josef Bacik
2020-08-24 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] btrfs: refactor btrfs_buffered_write() into process_one_batch() Qu Wenruo
2020-08-24 17:01 ` Josef Bacik
2020-08-24 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] btrfs: remove the again: tag in process_one_batch() Qu Wenruo
2020-08-24 17:02 ` Josef Bacik
2020-08-26 11:20 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200824075959.85212-1-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox