From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: qgroup: fix wrong qgroup metadata reserve for delayed inode
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:32:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200827113207.GL28318@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724064610.69442-1-wqu@suse.com>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:46:09PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> For delayed inode facility, qgroup metadata is reserved for it, and
> later freed.
>
> However we're freeing more bytes than we reserved.
> In btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata():
>
> num_bytes = btrfs_calc_metadata_size(fs_info, 1);
> ...
> ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc(root,
> fs_info->nodesize, true);
> ...
> if (!ret) {
> node->bytes_reserved = num_bytes;
>
> But in btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata():
>
> if (qgroup_free)
> btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc(node->root,
> node->bytes_reserved);
> else
> btrfs_qgroup_convert_reserved_meta(node->root,
> node->bytes_reserved);
>
> This means, we're always releasing more qgroup metadata rsv than we have
> reserved.
>
> This won't trigger selftest warning, as btrfs qgroup metadata rsv has
> extra protection against cases like quota enabled half-way.
>
> But we still need to fix this problem any way.
>
> This patch will use the same num_bytes for qgroup metadata rsv so we
> could handle it correctly.
>
> Fixes: f218ea6c4792 ("btrfs: delayed-inode: Remove wrong qgroup meta reservation calls")
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Added to misc-next.
Patch 2/2 should go to stable (4.19+) but it does not apply even to 5.8
due to some other intermediate changes. I have tagged it for 4.19 but it
will expectedly fail to apply. A backport would be needed then.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-27 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-24 6:46 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: qgroup: fix wrong qgroup metadata reserve for delayed inode Qu Wenruo
2020-07-24 6:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: qgroup: fix qgroup meta rsv leak for subvolume operations Qu Wenruo
2020-08-24 18:08 ` Josef Bacik
2020-08-25 5:18 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-08-24 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: qgroup: fix wrong qgroup metadata reserve for delayed inode Josef Bacik
2020-08-27 11:32 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200827113207.GL28318@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox