From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 34/38] btrfs: file: reserve qgroup space after the hole punch range is locked
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 10:46:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200830144632.GZ8670@sasha-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200829121123.GB20944@duo.ucw.cz>
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 02:11:23PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>> [ Upstream commit a7f8b1c2ac21bf081b41264c9cfd6260dffa6246 ]
>>
>> The incoming qgroup reserved space timing will move the data reservation
>> to ordered extent completely.
>>
>> However in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() will call
>> btrfs_invalidate_page(), which will clear QGROUP_RESERVED bit for the
>> range.
>>
>> In current stage it's OK, but if we're making ordered extents handle the
>> reserved space, then btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() can clear the
>> QGROUP_RESERVED bit before we submit ordered extent, leading to qgroup
>> reserved space leakage.
>>
>> So here change the timing to make reserve data space after
>> btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range().
>> The new timing is fine for either current code or the new code.
>
>I'm not sure why this is queued for -stable. It is preparation for
>future work, and that work is not queued for -stable.
So you understand why it was queued: it's preparation for a fix that is
relevant to 4.19 but didn't apply cleanly.
I can look into what happened next week, or if you'd sent me a backport
I'd be happy to take it.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-30 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200821161807.348600-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2020-08-21 16:18 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 34/38] btrfs: file: reserve qgroup space after the hole punch range is locked Sasha Levin
2020-08-29 12:11 ` Pavel Machek
2020-08-30 14:46 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200830144632.GZ8670@sasha-vm \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox