Re: [PATCH 00/12] Another batch of inode vs btrfs_inode cleanups

Josef Bacik
2020-08-31T15:43:39Z

On 8/31/20 7:42 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Here is the latest batch of inode vs btrfs_inode of interface cleanups for
> internal btrfs functions.
>
> Nikolay Borisov (12):
> btrfs: Make inode_tree_del take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make ordered extent tracepoint take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_dec_test_ordered_pending take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Convert btrfs_inode_sectorsize to take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_invalidatepage work on btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered btrfs_inode-centric
> btrfs: Make get_extent_skip_holes take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_find_ordered_sum take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make copy_inline_to_page take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_zero_range_check_range_boundary take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make extent_fiemap take btrfs_iode
>

Applied and built against misc-next, spot checked everything, you can add

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

to the whole series, thanks,

Josef