Re: [PATCH 00/12] Another batch of inode vs btrfs_inode cleanups

David Sterba
2020-09-01T14:14:41Z

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 02:42:37PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Here is the latest batch of inode vs btrfs_inode of interface cleanups for
> internal btrfs functions.
>
> Nikolay Borisov (12):
> btrfs: Make inode_tree_del take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make ordered extent tracepoint take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_dec_test_ordered_pending take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Convert btrfs_inode_sectorsize to take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_invalidatepage work on btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered btrfs_inode-centric
> btrfs: Make get_extent_skip_holes take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_find_ordered_sum take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make copy_inline_to_page take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make btrfs_zero_range_check_range_boundary take btrfs_inode
> btrfs: Make extent_fiemap take btrfs_iode

Added to misc-next, thanks. How many to go?