public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 097/330] btrfs: tree-checker: Check leaf chunk item size
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:57:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200918020110.2063155-97-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200918020110.2063155-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

[ Upstream commit f6d2a5c263afca84646cf3300dc13061bedbd99e ]

Inspired by btrfs-progs github issue #208, where chunk item in chunk
tree has invalid num_stripes (0).

Although that can already be caught by current btrfs_check_chunk_valid(),
that function doesn't really check item size as it needs to handle chunk
item in super block sys_chunk_array().

This patch will add two extra checks for chunk items in chunk tree:

- Basic chunk item size
  If the item is smaller than btrfs_chunk (which already contains one
  stripe), exit right now as reading num_stripes may even go beyond
  eb boundary.

- Item size check against num_stripes
  If item size doesn't match with calculated chunk size, then either the
  item size or the num_stripes is corrupted. Error out anyway.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index 91ea38506fbb7..84b8d6ebf98f3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -674,6 +674,44 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Enhanced version of chunk item checker.
+ *
+ * The common btrfs_check_chunk_valid() doesn't check item size since it needs
+ * to work on super block sys_chunk_array which doesn't have full item ptr.
+ */
+static int check_leaf_chunk_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
+				 struct btrfs_chunk *chunk,
+				 struct btrfs_key *key, int slot)
+{
+	int num_stripes;
+
+	if (btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot) < sizeof(struct btrfs_chunk)) {
+		chunk_err(leaf, chunk, key->offset,
+			"invalid chunk item size: have %u expect [%zu, %u)",
+			btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot),
+			sizeof(struct btrfs_chunk),
+			BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(leaf->fs_info));
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+
+	num_stripes = btrfs_chunk_num_stripes(leaf, chunk);
+	/* Let btrfs_check_chunk_valid() handle this error type */
+	if (num_stripes == 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (btrfs_chunk_item_size(num_stripes) !=
+	    btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot)) {
+		chunk_err(leaf, chunk, key->offset,
+			"invalid chunk item size: have %u expect %lu",
+			btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot),
+			btrfs_chunk_item_size(num_stripes));
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+out:
+	return btrfs_check_chunk_valid(leaf, chunk, key->offset);
+}
+
 __printf(3, 4)
 __cold
 static void dev_item_err(const struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot,
@@ -1265,7 +1303,7 @@ static int check_leaf_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 		break;
 	case BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY:
 		chunk = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_chunk);
-		ret = btrfs_check_chunk_valid(leaf, chunk, key->offset);
+		ret = check_leaf_chunk_item(leaf, chunk, key, slot);
 		break;
 	case BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY:
 		ret = check_dev_item(leaf, key, slot);
-- 
2.25.1


       reply	other threads:[~2020-09-18  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200918020110.2063155-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2020-09-18  1:57 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2020-09-18  1:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 187/330] btrfs: do not init a reloc root if we aren't relocating Sasha Levin
2020-09-18  1:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 188/330] btrfs: free the reloc_control in a consistent way Sasha Levin
2020-09-18  1:59 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 237/330] btrfs: fix setting last_trans for reloc roots Sasha Levin
2020-09-18  2:00 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 286/330] btrfs: don't force read-only after error in drop snapshot Sasha Levin
2020-09-18  2:00 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 287/330] btrfs: fix double __endio_write_update_ordered in direct I/O Sasha Levin
2020-09-18  2:01 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 320/330] btrfs: qgroup: fix data leak caused by race between writeback and truncate Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200918020110.2063155-97-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox